Jeffrey Sachs says the US is the main barrier to peace. In an interview from the UN, he said: “There’s a lot of frustration in this place today which is that the world leaders are here, everyone calls for peace and peace does not occur and diplomacy does not succeed..The Administration doesn’t know how to restrain the war machine.. Zelensky is coming to the US to drag the US into World WarIII”.

Watch the discussion...

 

Read the transcript:

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Hi everyone, Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Tuesday September 24th 2024. Our dear friend Professor Jeffrey Sachs joins us. Professor Sachs it’s always a pleasure, thank you very much for your time. You’re joining us from the United Nations. As usual throughout your career you’re at the intersection of great events: the president of the United States was there uh this morning, President Zelensky is in town, we don’t know if Prime Minister Netanyahu will show or will not show on Thursday or Friday. We keep getting different signals. Is the UN an effective means for peace in the world or with American hegemony and intransigence and British subservience and the veto in the Security Council is it ineffective?

Jeffrey Sachs: Well, the veto is the key point here. It is the meeting place of the world. I’m here on the opening day of the high-level debate so President Biden just spoke, President Erdogan just spoke, the King of Jordan just spoke, President Lula just spoke, so world leaders are here, they are meeting. There have been some important resolutions in recent days. One was a resolution following the decision of the International Court of Justice that Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian lands is illegal and then the General Assembly voted to take concrete steps that Israel must withdraw from those lands, but of course this is not enforceable if it’s blocked by the United States or by other powers. So there’s a lot of frustration in this place today which is that the world leaders are here, everyone calls for peace and peace does not occur and diplomacy does not succeed. To this point, this is the reality and the United States unfortunately has been a major obstacle to peace in the Middle East. For example, where everybody including President Biden again today said there need to be two states, Israel and the state of Palestine, and yet when the state of Palestine was to be admitted to the UN as a member state as the 194th member state, the US alone vetoed it. The United States is the barrier to peace. So this is really the grim reality that we have right now and it’s a very frightening time. The war in the Middle East obviously expanded tremendously in the last two days with Israel’s massive bombing of Lebanon, including Beirut, including the coastal areas which have not been bombed before, including more bombing today including thousands of people in Lebanon, civilians fleeing for their lives from Israeli bombs. The possibility of an imminent ground invasion exists, although that’s not sure and the war in Ukraine continues to lead to threats of further escalation. Zelensky is coming to the US to try to drag the US into World War III. I think it’s nothing short of that and that’s what he’s trying to do for whatever tragic or absurd reason. Because it’s not the reason in the normal sense so this is really the issue that we face. The leaders are here, everyone talks about peace and peace does not occur.

Napolitano: How was President Biden received when he either defended the Western and NATO war on Russia or articulated the need for a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians?

Sachs: When he said two-state solution there was applause throughout the entire chamber. There’s basically unanimity on that point, except practically Israel rejects it which is not their right under international law, they have no veto over the right of Palestinians and that’s what the ICJ also just said. so this was basically unanimously applauded but the United States, in practice, has simply armed Israel and prevented the realisation of the two-state solution. This is the most basic point. The Israeli government, which is an utterly extremist and violent government, doesn’t want it and the United States says whatever you want, we’re with you, just keep sending us the bills and we’ll keep shipping the money and we’ll keep shipping the bombs. That’s the truth. When Biden spoke about defending Ukraine which he did basically in useless language, that just would mean ongoing war or escalation, I’d say about half the chamber applauded. There was applause, but it was very different. It’s a divided world on that, there’s a completely divided viewpoint about what’s going on. My own view, of course, is that this war would end today if Biden said what he did not say, which is that NATO will not enlarge and the United States respects Russia’s security interests and Russia therefore has to respect the security interests of Ukraine. This war, in my view, and the view of John Mearsheimer and the view of many of your interlocutors and guests is this is a war that the US largely picked very unwisely thinking we just roll over Russia which was not to be because the US wanted to keep expanding its military alliance across the world, including to Russia’s border, and Russia said no.

Napolitano: Were you surprised when President Biden was confronted with reality by the defence department and apparently changed his mind from the preconceived and hinted at decision to give permission to the Ukrainians to use British and American long-range missiles to strike deep into Russia? It appears that President Putin and Foreign Minister Lavrov’s statements, which were clear and unambiguous, were taken seriously. It also appears that the defence department more or less contradicted the neocons and the state department and said we’re not ready for this Mr President. And Biden reluctantly changed his mind though it embarrassed British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Did any of that surprise you, Jeff?

Sachs: Well, it was a great relief because the statements by the Russians are very clear and should be taken very seriously, which is that we must avoid escalation to nuclear war. This is the single most important fact on the planet, we must listen and not show disdain when Russia or China or others say that is a red line for us because that threatens our security and then have people like our CIA director — shamefully by the way — say, oh don’t worry about that. He knows better by the way, he absolutely knows better. So the fact is that the United States, at least for the moment, has apparently said that it will not agree to the use of what are essentially US technologies, tracking systems and so forth, to enable Ukraine to strike with missiles deep into Russia. We should all breathe a sigh of relief and just pray that Biden or whoever is around him or whoever is really making these decisions understands we’re not playing a game of poker with bluffing, we’re talking about the survival of the world. And when a nuclear superpower on the other side, for reasons that are perfectly understandable, says “do not strike us deep into our territory because that would be a dramatic escalation and a war directly between the US and Russia because that could only be done with the US”, we should take that seriously, very seriously.

Napolitano: At the same time Professor Sachs, the United States is sending military equipment to the Philippines and Taiwan. Let’s start with the Philippines. Why on earth are we sending missiles to the Philippines other than to provoke the Chinese?

Sachs: Let us understand how serious this war machine of the United States is in revving up for war with China. There was a document about war with China by 2027. The talk like this is absolutely unbelievably dangerous. We should be exercising diplomacy, we should be solving problems of the South China Sea. China does not want the US to impose choke points on its sea lanes in which China brings its food and energy. And we talk about the fact that here are the choke lines and the US Navy can choke off China and that we are preparing for war by 2027. This is a kind of madness you know. Yes, I would expect generals and admirals to have their war games because that’s their business but I would not expect the US government to be allowing this kind of talk because our business is peace and safety for the American people and for the world and to avoid a nuclear war. And we’re not doing that right now. Of course, we have an administration that has been weak all along on this point, one that doesn’t know how to restrain the war machine. The president himself is at the end of his political career, he’s at the end of his administration. We don’t hear from him except once in a while. Today we heard a speech that he read from the teleprompter on the podium, but other than that we hear a lot of talk about war and it’s absolutely reckless and dangerous. And whenever you hear “don’t worry about it, we’re not going to be bluffed and so forth” please understand how absolutely irresponsible such talk is. We’re not in a poker game, we’re not in a game of risk, we’re in a game where we need to stay out of each other’s direct neighbourhoods so that we do not provoke an accidental or deliberate or pre-emptive nuclear war.

Napolitano: Why do we have a fleet in the South China Sea? Could you imagine if the Chinese had a fleet in the Caribbean or off the coast of New Jersey?

Sachs: Well, look we went through this once in a very vivid way when Russia — let me be clear, it was the Soviet Union in 1962 — decided to create such a base in Cuba. These were the most tense days in the history of the world because the United States said that it would never accept this and prepared for a world war to prevent it. I don’t know what it is in the psyches of these American leaders now that they cannot think through even for 10 seconds how we would react if things were put in our way just like you’ve explained. What if China or Russia said, “we’ll have a military base on the Rio Grande with Mexico or we’ll revive the idea of such a base in Cuba”. Would the Americans say okay, that’s fine? Or if we said, we don’t like that and the Chinese said it’s an open world you know, it’s none of your business, we would say you know what, it is fundamentally our business. Well Judge, when Russia says we don’t want your missiles and your military base on our 2,100 kilometre border with Ukraine you know what we say? We literally tell them it’s none of your business, it’s just between us and Ukraine and we say that with a straight face. I mean these people are either so profoundly cynical that they’re ready to risk nuclear war or they’re profoundly incapable of thinking for a moment about what it feels like on the other side, but they are failing to keep us safe. This is the most basic point and the most important point in the world is [there needs to be] a little space between the nuclear superpowers. The United States is filled with excitement about defending Taiwan and arming Taiwan. There’s a new several hundred million dollar package for Taiwan and billions and billions going in right now. And this is all taken as normal as if we can’t imagine what it would be like if China started to arm Mexico as I said. And I’ll tell you, you know an absolutely absurd illustration of this is a senior diplomat from a country in the Caribbean said to me that they were very upset and concerned because China wanted to help build a hospital in this island and the United States said no way. And this country was just asking my opinion, mentioning to me “is it safe to take a hospital, would it be prudent?” We’re talking about military bases all over China’s rims, all over China’s sea lanes and we say why are they upset. We’re talking about sending vast armaments to Taiwan and we’re wondering why are they upset about that? It’s unbelievable how much danger our country and our government is putting us into for no reason whatsoever.

Napolitano: Why does the Biden administration believe that China is the most significant challenge in US history when all China wants to do is be a commercial partner with us?

Sachs: Well, because this is a kind of mania of the United States that we need to be the undisputed number one. That’s the point of all of this.

Napolitano: Everywhere, even in China’s own backyard, we must have hegemony.

Sachs: Everywhere, it’s the literal doctrine of the United States that we must have primacy we must have full-spectrum dominance, to use the defence department’s terminology, in every region of the world – in East Asia, in South Asia, in Central Asia, in Eastern Europe, in Latin America, in the Caribbean, everywhere. That’s the American doctrine as if we can’t be safe without being the undisputed and indisputable powerhouse of the world. And somehow every other country in the world lives without having to dominate everyone else, but for the United States we can’t ever be safe unless we’re doing that. But obviously that’s the paradox. If we say we’re dominant everywhere, what we’re doing is threatening countries everywhere, we’re threatening any country that is large enough for the United States to say you’re too large, you are our threat, you are an enemy, and this is how we behave. We can’t take peace for an answer actually, we can only take subservience for an answer as if the goal is to be number one and unchallenged and recognised as number one. And, by the way at a microcosm this is exactly the Israel situation. Israel is not trying to live in peace with its neighbours, Israel is trying to pound into its neighbourhood, we are the regional power, we have nuclear weapons, we can defeat you, we can bomb you, we can assassinate your leaders, we can act with impunity, you need to fear us. And what is so provoking Israel is the other side doesn’t fear them, the other side’s fighting them and what Israel wants is not peace, it wants dominance and it wants to be feared and that’s how the US is on the global scale. Look at our military network, what kind of country in the world has overseas military bases in so many countries, hundreds of billions of dollars we’re spending as if we don’t have better things to do with that. I mean the only one that even remotely comes close to it is our teacher and you know mentor and predecessor in global hegemonic aspirations which was the British Empire. Look what it got them.It’s not a great way to safety.

Napolitano: The defence department ordered the movement of another 4,000 troops to the Middle East. What do you see coming between Hezbollah and Israel with respect to American involvement Professor Sachs?

Sachs: The main job of the US president is to stop the war machine. If you ask any general the answer always is “escalate, we can win Mr President, we can win, we can dominate”. That’s their job, but we’re supposed to have diplomats who have a very different job. Unfortunately we have an extremely weak diplomatic side right now, almost non-existent. The war machine dominates. The president of the United States has not been strong enough to keep this under control, that’s why we have raging wars in two zones and likely, or I won’t say likely, quite possibly a third where we’re revving up. So, yes, we’re sending more troops, the war is expanding. Israel has us around its finger and we can’t seem to say no to Netanyahu, especially before an election. Everyone is afraid or courting the money or afraid of being seen to be not a thousand percent in favour of whatever depredation Israel is committing at the moment. So this is the weakness of this administration.

Napolitano: Before we go to a clip of President Biden expressing what I think you will agree, and you heard him say it is an absurd opinion on the state of affairs between Ukraine and Russia, in your comings and goings at the UN have you picked up any hint or scuttlebutt or reliable information about whether or not Netanyahu will be formally charged and indicted for war crimes?

Sachs: Not a word, but I have picked up a lot of movement towards the state of Palestine really becoming the path to peace because there is a lot of diplomatic movement despite the United States, now that we need a path to peace. Everyone is hoping or surmising that when the whole world is so clear on the solution that the United States eventually is going to come along and stop promoting war and actually get on the side of peace.

Napolitano: Did the Mossad commit war crimes by the use of explosive material in the walkie-talkies and pagers of people in Lebanon that resulted in 3,000 injuries and hundreds of deaths?

Sachs: Undoubtedly, there’s a Convention of the United Nations against booby-trapped devices, precisely this kind of occurrence. This was a terrorist attack. Apparently it was an attack mainly against the civilian workers of Hezbollah who use these pagers, not against the military forces as has been discussed. I’m not sure if that’s the case, but that is what I hear. People should understand by the way what are these injuries. The pager beeped, people looked into the pager and then their eyes were blown out. This is one of the major injuries that came from this, the loss of sight from these exploding devices as people looked down at their pages that then exploded. And it’s women, it’s children, it’s people in the marketplace, it’s health workers, it’s people going about their business. This was a terrorist attack which shows by the way also, because one should have a pretty high confidence, that the CIA was either directly involved or knew all about it. This was not only against international law, a very explicit international law on booby-trapped devices and absolutely a terrorist attack, but it shows how our supply chains absolutely are becoming suborned by Western intelligence agencies. Israel does it, the United States does it, we point our finger at China, but we’re the ones committing these abuses and Israel should be held to account for this.

Napolitano: Do we know we’re funding the IDF? Do we also fund Mossad and is there an argument made that the American CIA or whoever dispenses these funds was involved in this genocidal act of blinding innocent civilians?

Sachs: Look, we’re involved with everything Israel does whether we’re directly involved in every step or not, we’re involved in funding the whole operation, we’re involved in enabling the whole operation every single day. These are our weapons, it’s our money, it’s shared intelligence, it’s close relations between the CIA and Mossad, very close. And in the past, because of that closeness when there has been an effective American president they’ve sometimes said no, stop, you can’t do that. When Israel, Britain and France decided to militarily take over the Suez Canal in 1956, Eisenhower told them, no way, you stop. And there have been other occasions where a strong president says to Israel you stop. That’s actually the job of the American president because when you have a trillion dollars invested in the war machine, believe me it’s always revving and generals always have a great idea and American allies, so-called because they don’t do me any good and you any good in security, but Ukraine and Israel and others want to use that trillion-dollar war machine and then tell us don’t worry about World War III. It’s just absolutely unbelievable.

Napolitano: Which do you think will explode first: Russia-Ukraine or Israel versus its neighbours? By explode first, I mean dragging the US in.

Sachs: Of course, either of them would be completely devastating. Israel wants us to be in a war with Iran. Iran has, of course, a very close security arrangement with Russia, that’s a path to World War III. Zelensky makes no bones about it, he wants NATO to be directly involved in the war, that’s World War III, take your choice. And both of these countries are equally irresponsible because they both think that they have their hand on the US war machine and again the president of the United States has the job to say, sorry, no you don’t, we have our security interests, we don’t want to get dragged into World War III. One gets a sense by the way that in a weak way Biden is trying to say this. So yes, maybe he is saying, don’t use our missile systems and technology to strike deep into Russia, don’t attack nuclear power plants. Maybe he is saying to Israel, as has been reported in the press in the last couple of days, don’t get into a war with Hezbollah, but is it working? No, that’s the question of the efficacy of the American presidency versus the lobbies versus the endlessly stupid and ignorant war talk of members of Congress who are on the take from the military industrial complex or from the Israel lobby or from whatever other lobby is pushing to use America’s war machine for their narrow advantages. But believe me, this is the time for grown-ups to act and God help us we better have them somewhere here.

Napolitano: Here’s the clip of what I think you probably heard earlier this morning from President Biden at the general assembly of the United Nations: “Biden: So at my direction America stepped into the breach providing massive security and economic and humanitarian assistance and our NATO allies and partners and 50-plus nations stood up as well, but most importantly the Ukrainian people stood up. I ask the people of this chamber to stand up for them. The good news is Putin’s war has failed and his core aim. He set out to destroy Ukraine but Ukraine is still free.” Bit absurd isn’t it that he’s still making an argument that Putin failed?

Sachs: Well, it’s just a pack of lies, misstatements, misrepresentations of history. President Biden was involved when he was vice-president in the overthrow of the Ukrainian government in 2014, that’s the start of the war. Of course, they don’t want to talk about that. The idea that Putin’s war has failed or that Putin wanted to take over Ukraine is absolutely absurd for anyone that follows more than the propaganda of the US government. What Putin wanted is that NATO not enlarge and admit Ukraine and that Ukraine honour the Minsk 2 agreement which was negotiated between Ukraine and the regions of eastern Ukraine for autonomy for those ethnically Russian regions. Those were Putin’s two demands, those were agreed in March 2022 and then the United States stopped the agreement. So what President Biden said there is not true, period. It’s a misrepresentation that has enabled a war that is bringing us closer to nuclear war. We need the truth, we need to understand the history, we need to understand how this war needs to end in order to be safe.

Napolitano: Will you be there when President Zelensky speaks?

Sachs: I’m around in the chamber and meeting delegations. So if and when he speaks I expect to hear him.

Napolitano: Professor Sachs, very much appreciated, I know your life is very busy, but this is an exceptionally busy week for you. The only saving grace is you get to go home at night, but thank you very much.

Sachs: Well, it’s great to be with you every week and this is a very timely day to be together to be discussing these things so I’m grateful to you.

 

https://johnmenadue.com/jeffrey-sachs-and-andrew-napolitano-us-a-menace-to-world-peace/

 

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

 

 

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

THESE WILL ALSO INCLUDE ODESSA, KHERSON AND KHARKIV.....

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

TRANSNISTRIA WILL BE PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

 

EASY.

 

THE WEST KNOWS IT.

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

Pierre-Emile Blairon

I was going to write: MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) are "committing" to war against Russia.

Of course they will not commit themselves; but they are not in the least troubled about sending their people to the slaughter, about possibly triggering a nuclear war that will cause tens of millions of military and civilian deaths, including old people, women and children, and the destruction of all the means of subsistence of those who will not have been lucky enough to die instantly; let us remember Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki… three cities completely destroyed as well as their inhabitants by those who are now attacking Russia and the European peoples.

The awareness of this past and future abomination should encourage the least informed (or the most brainless) to ask themselves questions in order to understand, finally, that our Western "elites", in their great majority, are at war against their own peoples, and this is not something that has been going on for some time.

We have, through many articles, explained how America, having become the World Order, had, in the aftermath of the Second World War, constituted the vassalage of Europe by installing in power in this new Europe men and women entirely acquired to the Atlanticist cause; I wrote on March 4, 2023, in this article: "Ukraine, the cradle and tomb of Europeans?»1

«One of the founders of this structure will be Jean Monnet, CIA agent (according to Marie-France Garaud, Philippe de Villiers, François Asselineau and many others), while other founders of this institution like Robert Schuman and the Belgian Paul-Henri Spaak will play the role of simple executors in the service of the United States.

We were led to believe that the Marshall Plan was set up by the Americans to, according to them, "help" the Europeans; this Marshall Plan was such a success for their business that they will not hesitate to provoke conflicts (all benefit for the military-industrial complex) to rebuild countries that they will have previously ruined or to plunder their resources. The list is endless (the most recent: Iraq, Syria, Libya, Serbia, Afghanistan). Ukraine has just entered the fray and there, the USA is doing very well: they are asking a small country, Ukraine, to go to war against a large country (Russia) that refuses their domination; Ukraine sends its population to be massacred, the weapons are supplied by the Europeans and it is the American companies (under the leadership of Blackrock) that will rebuild the devastated Ukraine, at the expense of the same Europeans.».

I have nothing more to add to what I wrote two years ago in this other article: "Lola, Islam, motion of censure, Ukraine: what is the RN playing at?»2

«Geopolitically, we now know that this Ukrainian affair was prefabricated long ago by the USA, the EU, NATO, the CIA or the World Order, as you prefer (but consider all these organizations or states as a single entity).

The World System represented by the USA has only one objective: to perpetuate its supremacy by eliminating all those who could undermine it; a Europe-Russia axis that could be established would be lethal for the World Empire which must block it at all costs; the Balkan affair, the deadly bombings on the Serbian population, the creation of the Islamic State of Kosovo had no other goal than to prevent this rapprochement. The Ukrainian affair is another attempt by the System to realize its imperialist project. The enemy of Europe is not Russia, it is the USA who do not hide their hostility towards Europeans and any nation that would thwart their project of taking over the world».

Below is the list of MEPs who voted for war on 18 September 2024, those who abstained, and those who voted against.3

Marion Maréchal and her group (Nicolas Bay, Guillaume Peltier, Laurence Trochu) voted for war; they are therefore four times unfaithful, the first time to their original party, Reconquête, the second time to their country, the third time to their people, the fourth time to a real Europe that never saw the light of day, free and independent of the World Order and which will have finally succeeded in making the connection with its big brother in the East. These people who have betrayed (also) our future and that of our children will be responsible for the misfortune that could happen because we cannot believe that they are incapable of imagining the consequences of their vote.

Sarah Knafo, the only representative of Reconquête, abstained.

All RN deputies voted against, except Jordan Bardella who was absent.

https://en.reseauinternational.net/voyage-en-absurdie-les-deputes-europeens-votent-pour-la-guerre-contre-la-russie/

 

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

 

 

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

THESE WILL ALSO INCLUDE ODESSA, KHERSON AND KHARKIV.....

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

TRANSNISTRIA WILL BE PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

 

EASY.

 

THE WEST KNOWS IT.

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

SEE ALSO: piers... some questions....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hMlf_lZGnc

WATCH | Donald Trump Praises Putin Standing Next to Zelensky | Viral Video | Times Now World

 

In a bold move, former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly praised Russian President Vladimir Putin, seemingly overshadowing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a recent appearance. Trump’s comments drew attention, highlighting his admiration for Putin while downplaying Zelensky's leadership. This moment sparked debates about Trump’s stance on Russia and Ukraine amid the ongoing conflict, with many questioning the implications of such remarks on international relations.

 

READ FROM TOP

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

SEE ALSO

Former US President Donald Trump has said that he “learned a lot” during a meeting with Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky on Friday, but that he has not changed his view that the conflict must be settled with a “fair deal.”

Trump and Zelensky met at Trump Tower in New York, after Zelensky had been heavily criticized by Republicans for appearing to campaign for Trump’s presidential opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, earlier this week. At a rally in North Carolina on Thursday, Trump accused Zelensky of “making little nasty aspersions” toward him, describing the Ukrainian leader as “a man who refuses to make a deal.”

In a short statement to reporters before the meeting, Trump boasted that he had a “very good relationship” with both Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, promising to “get [the Ukraine conflict] resolved very quickly” if he wins November’s election.

Appearing beside Zelensky afterwards, Trump said: “I learned a lot, but I think I haven’t changed from the standpoint that we both want to see this end and we both want to see a fair deal made.”

https://www.rt.com/news/604803-trump-zelensky-meeting-deal/