Thursday 12th of December 2024

climate demonstrations will continue....

Despite draconian anti-protest laws, the world’s biggest coal port was closed for four hours, 170 protestors were charged and climate demonstrations will continue. Wendy Bacon reports.

Newcastle port, the world’s biggest coal port, was closed for four hours on Sunday when hundreds of Rising Tide protesters in kayaks refused to leave its shipping channel. 

Over two days of protest, 170 protesters have been charged. Some others who entered the channel were arrested but released without charge. Hundreds more took to the water in support. 

Thousands on the beach chanted, danced and created a huge human sign demanding ‘no new coal and gas’ projects. Rising Tide is campaigning for a 78% tax on fossil fuel profits to be used for a “just transition” for workers and communities, including in the Hunter Valley, where the Albanese government has approved three massive new coal mine extensions since 2022. 

Protest size triples to 7,000

The NSW Labor government made two court attempts to block the protest from going ahead. But the ten day Rising Tide protest tripled in size from 2023 with 7000 people participating so far and more people arrested in civil disobedience actions than last year.

The ‘protestival’ continued in Newcastle on Monday, and a new wave will start in Canberra at the Australian Parliament on Wednesday. Here Rising Tide will stage an overnight occupation of the lawn outside Parliament House and a demonstration at which they will demand to meet with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

News of the ‘protestival’ has spread around the world, with campaigners in Rotterdam in The Netherlands blocking a coal train in solidarity with this year’s Rising Tide protest.  

138 of those arrested have been charged under S214A of the NSW Crimes Act for disrupting a major facility, which carries up to two years in prison and $22,000 maximum fines. This section is part of the NSW government regime of ‘anti-protest’ laws designed to deter movements such as Rising Tide. 

The rest of the protesters have been charged under the Marine Safety Act which police used against 109 protesters arrested last year. Even if found guilty, these people are likely to only receive minor penalties.Those arrested in 2023 mostly received small fines, good behaviour bonds and had no conviction recorded. 

Executive gives the bird to judiciary

The use of the Crimes Act will focus more attention on the anti-protest laws which the NSW government has been extending and strengthening in recent weeks. The NSW Supreme Court has already found the laws to be partly unconstitutional but despite huge opposition from civil society and human rights organisations, the NSW government has not reformed them. 

Two protesters were targeted for special treatment: Naomi Hodgson, a key Rising Tide organiser, and Andrew George who has previous protest convictions. 

George was led into court in handcuffs on Monday morning but was released on bail on condition that he not return to the port area. Hodgson also has a record of peaceful protest. She is one of the Rising Tide leaders who have always stressed the importance of safe and peaceful action.

The police prosecutor argued that she should remain in custody. The magistrate released her with the extraordinary requirement that she report to police daily and not go nearer than 2 kilometres from the port.

Planning for this year’s protest has been underway for 12 months, with groups forming in Brisbane, Adelaide, Melbourne, Canberra Sydney and the Northern Rivers, as well as Newcastle. There was an intensive program of meetings and briefings of potential participants on the motivation for protesting, principles of civil disobedience and the experience of being arrested. Those who attended last year recruited a whole new cohort of protesters.

Last year, the NSW police authorised a protest involved a 48 hour blockade which protesters extended by two hours. Earlier this year, a similar application was made by Rising Tide. The first indication that the police would refuse to authorise a protest came earlier this month when the NSW police successfully applied to the NSW Supreme Court for the protest to be declared “an unauthorised protest.”

But Justice Desmond Fagan also made it clear that Rising Tide had a “responsible approach to on-water safety” and that he was not giving a direction that the protest should be terminated. Newcastle Council agreed that Rising Tide could camp at Horseshoe Bay. 

Minns’ bid to crush protest

The Minns government showed that its goal was to crush the protest altogether when the Minister for Transport Jo Haylen declared a blanket 97 hour exclusion zone making it unlawful to enter the Hunter River mouth and beaches under the Marine Safety Act last week. 

On Friday, Rising Tide organiser and  2020 Newcastle Young Citizen of the year, Alexa Stuart took successful action in the Supreme Court to have the exclusion zone declared an invalid use of power. 

An hour before the exclusion zone was due to come into effect at 5 pm, the Rising Tide flotilla had been launched off Horseshoe Bay. At 4 pm, Supreme Court Justice Sarah McNaughton quashed the exclusion zone notice, declaring that it was an invalid use of power under the Marine Safety Act because the object of the Act is to facilitate events, not to stop them from happening altogether. 

When news of the judge’s decision reached the beach, a big cheer erupted. The drama-packed weekend was off to a good start. 

Friday morning began with a First Nations welcome and speeches and a SchoolStrike4Climate protest. Kayakers held their position on the harbour with an overnight vigil on Friday night. 

On Saturday, Midnight Oil front singer Peter Garrett, who served as Environment Minister in a previous Labor government, performed in support of Rising Tide protest. He expressed his concern about government overreach in policing protests, especially in the light of all the evidence of the impacts of climate change.

Ships continued to go through the channel, protected by the NSW police. When kayakers entered the channel while it was empty, nine were arrested.

84-year-old great-gran arrested not charged

By late Saturday, three had been charged, and the other six were towed back to the beach. This included June Norman, an 84-year-old great-grandmother from Queensland, who entered the shipping channel at least six times over the weekend in peaceful acts of civil disobedience.

She told MWM that she felt a duty to act to protect her own grandchildren and all other children due to a failure by the Albanese and other governments to take action on climate change. The police repeatedly declined to charge her.   

On Sunday morning a decision was made for kayakers “to take the channel”. At about 10.15, a coal boat, turned away before entering the port. 

Port closed, job done

Although the period of stoppage was shorter than last year, civil disobedience had now achieved what the authorised protest achieved last year. The port was officially closed and remained so for four hours. By now, 60 people had been charged and far more police resources expended than in 2023, including hours of police helicopters and drones. 

On Sunday afternoon, hundreds of kayakers again occupied the channel. A ship was due. Now in a massive display of force involving scores of police in black rubber zodiacs, police on jet skis, and a huge police launch, kayakers were either arrested or herded back from the channel. When the channel was clear, a huge ship then came through the channel, signalling the reopening of the port. 

On Monday night, ABC National News reported that protesters were within metres of the ship. MWM closely observed the events. When the ship began to move towards the harbour, all kayaks were inside the buoys marking the channel. Police occupied the area between the protesters and the ship. No kayaker moved forward.

A powerful visual message had been sent that the forces of the NSW state would be used to defend the interests of the big coal companies such as Whitehaven and Glencore rather than the NSW public.  

By now police on horses were on the beach and watched as small squads of police marched through the crowd grabbing paddles. A little later this reporter was carrying a paddle through a car park well off the beach when a constable roughly seized it without warning from my hand. 

When asked, Constable Pacey explained that I had breached the peace by being on water. I had not entered the water over the weekend.  

Kids arrested too, in mass civil disobedience

Those charged included 14 people under 18. After being released, they marched chanting back into the camp. 16 year old Newcastle student Niamh Cush told a crowd of fellow protesters before her arrest that as a young person, she would rather not be arrested but that the betrayal of the Albanese government left her with no choice. 

“I’m here to voice the anger of my generation. The Albanese Government claims they’re taking climate change seriously but they are completely and utterly failing us by approving polluting new coal and gas mines.See you out on the water today to block the coal ships!”

Each of those who chose to get arrested has their own story. They include environmental scientists, engineers, TAFE teachers, students, nurses and doctors, hospitality and retail workers, designers and media workers, activists who have retired, unionists, a mediator and a coal miner. 

They came from across Australia – more than 200 came from Adelaide alone – and from many different backgrounds. 

Behind those arrested stand volunteer groups of legal observers, arrestee support, lawyers, community care workers and a media team. Beside them stand hundreds of other volunteers who have cleaned portaloos, prepared three meals a day, washed dishes, welcomed and registered participants, organised camping spots and acted as marshals at pedestrian crossings. Each and every one of them is playing an essential role in this campaign of mass civil disobedience.

Many participants said this huge collaborative effort is what inspired them and gave them hope, as much as did the protest itself. 

Threat to democracy

Today, the President of NSW Civil Liberties Tim Roberts said, “Paddling a kayak in the Port of Newcastle is not an offence, people do it every day safely without hundreds of police officers. A decision was made to protect the safe passage of the vessels over the protection of people exercising their democratic rights to protest. 

“We are living in extraordinary times. Our democracy will not irrevocably be damaged in one fell swoop – it will be a slow bleed, a death by a thousand tranches of repressive legislation, and by thousands of arrests of people standing up in defence of their civil liberties.”

Australian Institute research shows that most Australians agree with the Council for Civil Liberties – with 71% polled including a majority of all parties believing that the right to protest should be enshrined in Federal legislation, including a majority across all ages and political parties. 

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that it is a fear of accelerating mass civil disobedience in the face of a climate crisis that frightens both the Federal and State governments and the police. 

As temperatures rise

Many of those protesting have already been directly affected by climbing temperatures in sweltering suburbs, raging bushfires and intense smoke, roaring floods and a loss of housing that has not been replaced, devastated forests, polluting coal mines and gas fields or rising seas in the Torres Strait in Northern Australia and Pacific Island countries. 

Others have become profoundly concerned as they come to grips with climate science predictions and public health warnings. 

In these circumstances, and as long as governments continue to enable the fossil fuel industry by approving more coal and gas projects that will add to the climate crisis, the number of people who decide they are morally obliged to take civil disobedience action will grow. 

Rather than being impressed by politicians who caste them as disrupters, they will heed the call of Pacific leaders who this week declared the Cop 29 talks to be a “catastrophic failure” exposing their people to “escalating risks”.  

Wendy Bacon is a Rising Tide supporter. 

https://michaelwest.com.au/climate-protests-to-continue-despite-170-charged-in-newcastle-protestival/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.

rising tide.....

Hundreds of climate protestors disrupted the last sitting week of the Federal Parliament on Wednesday, with 24 of them arrested, two spent the night in custody, the rest released on condition they stay away for two years. Wendy Bacon reports.

Rising Tide travelled from Newcastle to Canberra on Monday and set up camp at the invitation of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy, which is supporting the climate activists. Their forty-eight-hour vigil ends today. Protesters are demanding an end to new or expanded fossil fuel projects and a 78% tax on fossil fuel profits to support communities that are currently dependent on fossil fuel jobs.

Protesters are already bitterly disappointed with what they see as a Labor betrayal of a promise to improve climate policy. Instead of decreasing, coal exports will rise back over 200 million tonnes per annum in the next two years, while gas exports have settled at levels 60% higher than in 2016.

The Australian taxpayer also continues to subsidise the fossil fuel industry while the Labor government actively entertains the illusion of carbon capture and storage.

 

READ MORE:

https://michaelwest.com.au/climate-protesters-arrested-outside-parliament-banned-from-the-grounds/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.

 

climate battles...

 

Environment: Climate protesters blockade Newcastle’s coal port despite government bans    By Peter Sainsbury

 

 

Draconian laws don’t discourage climate protesters. Hydrogen’s rainbow of colours. CCS continues to underperform. Clean energy investments increasing but so are investments in fossil fuels.

 

Destroying lives v inconveniencing the public

George Monbiot in The Guardian recently compared the draconian jail sentences legislated and imposed during the previous UK Conservative government’s term of office (and now defended by Starmer’s Labour government) on peaceful, though admittedly disruptive, climate protesters with the ludicrously lenient suspended sentences imposed on violent criminals, sometimes by the very same judge. All this occurring while rapidly escalating climate change destroys people’s health, homes, livelihoods, communities and environments. And while the individuals and companies responsible for the climate mayhem are free to not only continue their selfish, civilisation-destroying ways but also wield enormous power and influence over national governments and global intergovernmental organisations.

Monbiot makes the crucial point that although judicial authorities and others are quick to assert that the sentences cited in all his comparisons represent the proper application of legislated sentencing guidelines, this does not make it right – legal, yes; morally right, no. Rather, the new laws ‘ensure that nonviolent protest is routinely treated as a more serious crime than most forms of violence. The issue is precisely that this asymmetry is institutionalised’.

Monbiot also criticises the ‘context stripping’ that occurs in the courts (where climate protesters are now forbidden to explain their motivations in the UK) and in the media where reporting of the actions of climate protesters frequently lacks local and global context and little mention is made of the role of global warming and its causes in the reporting of cyclones, bushfires, floods, famines, etc. According to Monbiot: ‘What we see in all these cases is a fatal lack of moral seriousness. We are swept along on a storm surge of virulent trivia [and have] allowed ourselves to be perennially distracted from what will be, if unaddressed, the only issues that count’.

Blockade of Newcastle coal port

Enough of the UK, what of Australia? State governments across Australia have been passing increasingly punitive laws to deter and punish climate protesters. Going a step further, the NSW government imposed an exclusion zone around Newcastle Harbour to prevent protestors kayaking into the shipping channel to block the progress of coal carriers last weekend – a decision that was, he smugly notes, declared invalid by the NSW Supreme Court.

I imagine many readers saw some media coverage of the blockade of the world’s largest coal export facility last weekend by thousands of climate activists. I was there again this year and spent some time on a kayak in the shipping channel – but didn’t get arrested.

I was also one of a group of health workers seeking to highlight the very serious harmful effects of climate change and air pollution on people’s health, effects that are caused by burning coal. As well as participating in the activities in and around the harbour, we visited the Saturday Christmas Market in Newcastle CBD to hand out flyers (see below) and engage shoppers in a discussion about the health issues. Many but not all were sympathetic to our message.

Of course, Newcastle may be the biggest coal port in the world (currently exporting approximately 100 million tonnes per year) but it is simply a staging post for the coal that is mined further up the Hunter Valley – mined with devastating outcomes for the local environment and communities.

 

It’s impossible to believe that Newcastle will stop exporting coal while mining companies further up the Hunter are still digging it out of the ground and countries overseas are buying it. Rapid change is, however, needed and that is why the three demands of Rising Tide, the blockade organisers, are:

  • No new coal. No new gas.
  • Tax fossil fuel export profits at 78% to fund community and industrial transition.
  • End all coal exports from Newcastle by 2030.

Colourful hydrogen

When I wrote about hydrogen power a little while ago, I didn’t realise that there is a veritable rainbow of ‘clean’ hydrogens....

Blue hydrogen is produced by mixing natural (i.e. fossil) gas with steam (produced with heat provided by burning fossil fuels) and then permanently burying the CO2 released using carbon capture and storage (CCS).

Green (electrolytic) hydrogen is produced by splitting water molecules with renewable energy.

Turquoise hydrogen is produced by heating but not combusting plant and waste biomass – a process known as gasification. This also requires CCS of the CO2 by-product.

White hydrogen is extracted from the natural reservoir of hydrogen in the Earth’s subsurface.

Pink hydrogen is like green hydrogen but uses nuclear energy.

And let’s not forget grey hydrogen produced like blue but without even bothering to capture and store the carbon. As the figure below shows, however, if coal is the source of the energy needed to produce the steam, it’s really black hydrogen.

Silly me, I thought hydrogen was colourless.

Hydrogen’s colour palate is not of purely whimsical interest, however. The global warming impact of hydrogen power is highly dependent on the method of its production, the hydrogen and methane fugitive emission rates during production and transport, its actual end-use and the climate warming time scale under consideration. A recent study found that depending on these factors, hydrogen use might be almost free of greenhouse gas emissions or increase them by 50%. Worst of all, if the renewable energy used to produce the hydrogen needs to be replaced in the grid with electricity from fossil fuels, emissions will almost quadruple.

The problems associated with, and limitations on, the use of hydrogen as a power source that I mentioned previously apply to all its H-ues.

CCS continues to disappoint

While we’re talking about CCS, recent data from Chevron’s CCS project at their Gorgon Liquified Natural Gas facility off the coast of WA (the world’s largest CCS project) yet further confirms its dismal underperformance. When the project was approved, it was on the condition that it captured 80% of the CO2 removed from the gas reservoir from 2016. The CCS facility only began to operate in 2019 and since then the capture rate has fallen steadily from 70% in 2019/20 to 30% in 2023/24.

Not only that, the actual amount captured has fallen steadily from approximately 2.7 to 1.6 MtCO2 per year, and the cost, which was expected to be about $70 per tonne of CO2 captured, has increased from $104 to $222 per tonne. Remembering that the CO2 that comes up the pipe with the burnable natural gas is but a small fraction of the total greenhouse gases produced in the production, processing, transport and burning of LNG.

Global investments in energy generation, storage and use

The International Energy Agency’s headline is that ‘The world now invests almost twice as much in clean energy as it does in fossil fuels’ and if we follow the IEA’s logic that has been the case since 2016.

But we need to be careful not to interpret this as meaning that the world is now investing more in solar and wind power than coal, oil and gas. If we look closely at the IEA’s histogram, we see that the Agency’s definition of ‘clean energy’ goes well beyond generating energy from wind and solar (what it calls ‘renewable power’). In fact, in 2024 global investments in fossil fuels (US$1116 billion) were almost 50% higher than investments in sun and wind (US$771 billion).

The big investor in ‘renewable power’ in 2024 was, no surprise, China (US$359 billion), with the European Union (US$106 billion) and the USA (US$85 billion) way behind in second and third places.

That said, investments in solar PV energy generation (US$503 billion – light blue below) now exceed investments in all other energy generation technologies (US$426 billion – dark blue). Investments in wind power come second but with only 40% of the investment in solar.

The investment by the oil and gas industry in clean energy has been increasing steadily over the last decade and is now approximately US$30 billion/year but it still represents less than 4% of the industry’s total capital expenditure and just over 1% of net income – nothing more than token investments really.

Industries’ and investors’ expectations for the long-term future of each fuel source are pretty clear in the following graph that shows global investments for 2021-24. Solar PV leads the way in both the annual amount invested and the rate of increase, followed by wind. Nuclear is having a bit of a resurgence but at relatively low levels of investment. Coal is clearly seen to be on the decline, investments having fallen by 40% in four years. ...

However, investment in all fossil fuels combined has been on the increase since 2020 and the IEA predicts that this trend will continue. (Low-emissions fuels includes bioenergy, low-emissions hydrogen and hydrogen-based fuels generated using fossil fuels, and carbon capture and storage.)

Remember though that these figures relate to investments, not the actual amount of energy generated by each source at present, over three-quarters of which is still produced from fossil fuels. And although the percentage is falling slowly the actual amount produced by fossil fuels is still increasing.

Broken record alert: don’t tell me how much more renewable energy is being produced, tell me how much fossil fuel is being burnt.

Who are the ones threatening public safety?

Who are the real criminals? Who are their lickspittles?

https://johnmenadue.com/environment-climate-protesters-blockade-newcastles-coal-port-despite-government-bans/

 

 

 

SEE ALSO: https://yourdemocracy.net/drupal/node/41125

 

seaglider — gus leonisky contribution to saving the planet...

 

The main trick in SeaGlider is to create slightly different pitch in the wing/sails. As the wind thus tries to topple this (a bit like the wind acting upon a free-spinning propeller), the spin in counteracted by the centreboard, the rudder and the flaps — transforming it into a forward momentum and general lifting of the craft with a significant increase in apparent wind. High precision is needed to maintain balance. This is achieved by computerised adjustments of flaps, pitch and rudder with minimum pitching and rolling of the craft, also counteracting the variable speeds of the wind. The various controls help maintain an altitude of about 5 metres above the sea surface when flat and 10 metres in waves up to 5 metres in depth, while travelling at an average cruising speed between 60 to 120 knots — only using the wind as a propellant. The craft would have to travel by "tacking" and "gybing", in order to maintain a differential suction on the wing/sail system in regard to the direction of the wind. 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.