SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
a beef with the american beef....Australia has lifted biosecurity restrictions on beef imports from the United States, one of the key grievances that led the Trump administration to impose tariffs on Australia. The US has been able to export its beef to Australia since 2019, but certain products were banned over concerns related to mad cow disease, including beef sourced from Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the US. Because the American supply chain is so integrated, it meant an effective ban on all US beef to Australia since most of it could not be reliably traced. The government says the US introduced more robust movement controls earlier this year, meaning cattle could be traced back through the supply chain to their original farms, allowing more certainty that products were not carrying disease or pests dangerous to Australia. "The Albanese Labor government will never compromise on biosecurity," Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said. "The US Beef Imports Review has undergone a rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade. "The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." Ms Collins said the decision was the culmination of a ten-year process, and denied the timing of the decision was related to Mr Trump's tariffs. "This decision has been purely based on science," she said. Littleproud: confidence needed protections are not being 'traded away'Nationals Leader David Littleproud said the government must progress the decision calmly and "get this right". "It's just the swiftness with which this has been done … it looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," Mr Littleproud said. "What we need to provide is confidence, and as legislators [with] something as serious as biosecurity, we can't allow that to happen." Mr Littleproud said an independent review of the government's decision was necessary to ensure confidence. The vast majority of beef trade between Australia and the US is of Australian beef sold to America. $14 billion in Australian beef was sold last year, with the US being the single largest market, followed by China. But a 10 per cent tariff on Australian beef was imposed by US President Donald Trump in April, with export restrictions on US beef being one of the administration's key grievances. "Australia's market remains closed to fresh US beef and beef products," the administration complained in its Foreign Trade Barriers report earlier this year. Australia closed its market to US beef in 2003 after the fatal neurological disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, was discovered in American cattle. Will Evans, CEO of Cattle Australia, told ABC Radio National the department had undertaken a technical, scientific assessment. "We have to put faith in them," he said. "We are a global advocate for rules and science-based trading. Unfortunately, in this circumstance, it means we have to open a door that, as a producer, you probably wouldn't want to open. "But we have to recognise that the science has been used here to make this decision." Mr Evans said the US was an important trading partner and Australia needed to maintain the relationship with them. A report by Meat and Livestock Australia released in June found the beef tariff had not hurt trade, which had risen 32 per cent year-to-date. ========================
They came to learn us cricket in the days of long ago, An' Hanlan came from Canada to learn us how to row, An' doctors' come from Frisco just to learn us how to skite, An' pugs from all the lands on earth to learn us how to fight; An' when they go, as like as not, we find we're taken in, They've left behind no learnin' - but they've carried off our tin.
HENRY LAWSON, A Word to Texas Jack.
=================
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
|
User login |
biosecurity....
Farmers have backed calls for an independent inquiry into the scrapping of a longstanding ban on beef imports from the United States, after cattle producers told a review they feared beef from risky countries could enter Australia under the new rules.
While the Albanese government insisted its decision on beef imports was based on science and unrelated to the tariff negotiations, the Trump administration hailed a major trade victory that would “make agriculture great again”.
The Coalition is demanding more detail, saying it feared the government was trading away Australia’s strict biosecurity regulation to help score a trade deal with US President Donald Trump.
US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins issued a statement congratulating the president on “the major trade breakthrough” and saying it would “make agriculture great again”.
“This is yet another example of the kind of market access the president negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity, with American agriculture leading the way,” she said.
Rollins insisted American beef was safe and claimed Australia’s trade barriers had not been based on science, saying: “Gone are the days of putting American farmers on the sidelines.”
Agriculture Minister Julie Collins and Trade Minister Don Farrell said repeatedly on Thursday that Australia’s decision was not related to the trade talks and had been years in the making.
The US National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, the peak lobbying group for American beef producers, said it was “pleased that president Trump has successfully opened the Australian market to American beef.”
“For 20 years, US beef was denied access to Australia while Australia exported $US29 billion ($44 billion) of beef to US consumers,” the association’s president Buck Wehrbein said, adding the issue had “been a sticking point for many years”.
Since 2019, Australia has allowed US beef into the country, but blocked meat from cattle born in Mexico and Canada before being slaughtered in America. This effectively meant all beef from the continent was blocked because US supply chains are highly integrated. No US beef has been imported since 2019.
This masthead revealed last month that the Albanese government was considering lifting the restrictions on US access to Australia’s beef market via a biosecurity review amid trade talks between the two countries over Trump’s 10 per cent import tariff.
Collins said the government would not compromise on biosecurity, and that the change to import rules came after a detailed departmental review.
Asked repeatedly if the call was triggered by Trump’s claims earlier this year that Australia was blocking US beef, Collins said the review process pre-dated Trump.
“This decision has been purely based on the science and a rigorous assessment by my department,” she said.
Australia began reviewing American beef imports in 2015, and in 2020 the US applied for expanded access to include cattle raised in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US.
Collins did not directly answer questions on the nature of US assurances around traceability measures for cattle born in Mexico or Canada that are then slaughtered in the US.
The federal government has previously estimated a foot-and-mouth outbreak could cost the economy $80 billion.
Cattle Australia, in its submission to the biosecurity review that preceded the government’s decision, said it held concerns about the traceability of cattle entering the US from Mexico, particularly if those cattle were initially imported from Central America.
In 2019, Mexico signed an agreement to import cattle from Guatemala, which is deemed a more risky country by US officials. Those cows are not allowed into the US or Australia.
US rules stipulate that cattle from Mexico are branded with the letter “M” to mark their provenance, but Australian cattle groups expressed fears about opening the local market to Mexican beef.
“Cattle Australia does not believe that the US currently can provide an equivalent level of individual lifetime animal traceability (for animals imported specifically from Mexico) to that of the Australian system,” the association said in its submission.
“These products must be accurately and clearly labelled in order to provide Australian consumers with the ability to make informed choices.”
Cattle Australia chief executive Will Evans said on ABC radio on Thursday that he was not thrilled with the decision but acknowledged it had been done via a scientific process and was aligned with Australia’s position as an open trading nation.
Nationals leader David Littleproud called for an independent scientific panel review into the government’s move after he received a briefing he said could not answer key questions.
“I back the industry to have an independent scientific panel to actually review that science,” Littleproud said.
Littleproud said precedent for such a panel was put in place when he was agriculture minister handling a white spot disease outbreak.
“It looks as though [biosecurity] has been traded away to appease Donald Trump,” Littleproud said earlier on ABC radio.
National Farmers’ Federation president David Jochinke backed Littleproud’s call for an independent inquiry, saying the organisation respected the government’s decision but said the industry should be given more information on how it was made.
“We want to ensure that Australian producers have confidence in the system, and we don’t get that confidence if we don’t understand how either the decision is made or ultimately why the decision was put through this time frame,” Jochinke said.
Michael Ward, the chair of veterinary public health and food safety at the University of Sydney, said: “I’m a bit perplexed at why we’ve seen this change. I think there’s a need for more transparency to maintain confidence in the system.”
Trump and members of his administration have criticised Australia’s beef import rules.
“Our farmers are blocked from selling almost anywhere ... Australia won’t let us sell beef,” US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in April.
Farrell told reporters on Thursday that his US counterparts had not raised the beef issue in recent trade talks, sticking to the government line that the beef switch was unrelated to tariffs.
In Ballan, north-west of Melbourne, beef producer Nick Sher said he doubted US beef would be enticing for Australian consumers because it would probably be more expensive.
“The quality of what we produce would be better than what we could import from the US,” he said. “I can’t see it hitting the supermarket shelves.”
Meat & Livestock Australia managing director Michael Crowley said the impact of US and Canadian beef entering Australia would be minimal, citing Australians’ preference for locally produced meat.
NSW Farmers association biosecurity committee chair Tony Hegarty said the Albanese government needed to explain what evidence it had used to make the decision.
“We want to see the evidence that Australia will remain free of biosecurity risks that only a few weeks ago, the Albanese government wasn’t budging on,” Hegarty said.
With Daniel Lo Surdo, Brittany Busch and Nick Newling
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australia-lifts-us-beef-ban-after-trump-demands-20250724-p5mhdv.html
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
ACCORDING TO SOME WAGGING TAILS, THE US BEEF WON'T MAKE IT TO SUPERMARKETS... BUT COULD ENTER THE FOODCHAIN VIA MACDONALD's and PET-FOOD.... SAME THING REALLY....
going up....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-ZCVQ1Xis8
Donald Trump's Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick makes a fool of himself with factless argument that prices will be "shockingly low" for consumers before getting hit with the facts over data proving prices will be effected in opposite ways by Trump's tariffs and executive orders. John Iadarola and Luke Beasley break it down on The Damage Report....
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
screw this....
BY Nicholas Welsh — DW
An outbreak of flesh-eating parasites in central and northern America has begun spreading through livestock. The New World screwworm is a parasitic fly that lays its larvae in open wounds of warm-blooded animals — and humans.
The screwworm fly, once eradicated, has resurfaced in Mexico, infecting thousands of livestock and killing one person. The fly lays eggs in wounds, and larvae consume hosts from within. Ranchers blame poor border controls and fear underreporting. The US has halted cattle imports and restarted sterilized fly programs — but farmers say time is running out.
https://www.dw.com/en/parasitic-screwworm-outbreak-raises-concerns-in-texas/video-73661878
===============
US authorities are preparing to release billions of flies from airplanes over Mexico and southern Texas to stop the spread of a dangerous parasite, the Associated Press (AP) has reported. The move aims to protect livestock, wildlife, and household pets from a flesh-eating maggot.
Unlike most flies that feed on rotting or dead tissue, the screwworm fly poses a far greater threat as it lays its eggs in open wounds or mucous membranes of living warm-blooded animals and humans. Once hatched, the larvae burrow into the flesh, feeding on living tissue from the inside out, often causing severe infections or death if left untreated.
“A thousand-pound bovine can be dead from this in two weeks,” Michael Bailey, president-elect of the American Veterinary Medical Association, told the news agency.
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) is reportedly planning to mass-breed adult male flies, sterilize them using radiation, and release them into the wild. The sterile males will mate with wild females, producing no offspring and gradually wiping out the parasite population.
“It’s an exceptionally good technology,” said Edwin Burgess, an assistant professor at the University of Florida who studies parasites. He added that it could help solve “some kind of large problem.”
READ MORE: Russians warned about locust invasion – mediaThe measure is seen as a more effective and environmentally friendly method of disinsectization than spraying pesticides, the AP noted, adding that other nations north of Panama eradicated the same pest decades ago. Sterile flies from a factory in the Central American state reportedly kept the dangerous insects contained there for years, but they reappeared in southern Mexico at the end of 2024.
According to the AP, the USDA will launch a new screwworm fly facility in southern Mexico as soon as next summer, with a fly distribution center expected to begin operating by the end of the current year. This will enable the US to import and distribute flies from Panama if necessary. The department is reportedly planning to spend some $8.5 million on the Texas facility and $21 million to convert a site in southern Mexico, currently used for breeding sterile fruit flies, into one for screwworm flies.
https://www.rt.com/news/620993-us-billions-flies-mexico-texas/?ysclid=mees8itcx8772133299
===============
READ FROM TOP.
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.