Monday 23rd of December 2024

the fat man cometh with bombs, misery and pestilence plus a tad of goodwill....

CHRISTMAS COMES ONCE A YEAR AND IS A WESTERN WORLD INVENTION DATING BACK UPTO 1700 YEARS... THE BIRTH OF CHRIST AND ITS RELIGIOUS DERIVATIVE BEYOND EASTER WAS A FALLACY DESIGNED TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE BELIEVED AND "FOLLOWED THE RULES"... WE (GUS AND HIS DEVILS) HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED ON THIS SITE, HOW THE TEXTS OF CHRISTIANITY WERE INVENTED BACK THEN TO SUIT A POLITICAL CLIMATE. 

 

SO, NOT SO STRANGELY, THE LEGEND STILL PERSISTS IN THE WESTERN WORLD AND OTHER CHRISTIAN BELIEFS, INCLUDING THE ORTHODOX CHURCHES OF RUSSIA... WE, ATHEIST, TRY TO TAKE CHRISTMAS — THE DATE OF WHICH WAS CHOSEN TO TAKE OVER THE TIMING OF A PAGAN RITE — SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO PROMOTE PEACE, THOUGH IT IS A HARD SELL. 

THE AMERICAN EMPIRE, WHILE MOST OF ITS CITIZENS ARE ENJOYING A STUFFED TURKEY AFTER THE VISIT OF SANTA CLAUS (ST NICK), CARRIES ON WITH ITS NEFARIOUS HYPOCRITICAL ACTIVITIES FROM THE FOOT OF FIR TREE... DECEIT IS RIFE. AS WE HAVE LONG HARPED ABOUT, DECEIT HAS BEEN WHAT HAS MADE THE HUMAN SPECIES SO SUCCESSFUL IN THE NATURAL WORLD WHILE BEING THE NAKED MONKEY...

 

MEANWHILE:

Christmas: Beyond the fantastical      By John Queripel

 

One of the fondest memories we carry is of how when we were young, the world was infused with magic, especially at Christmas. We would wake on Christmas Day surrounded by the gifts Santa Claus had mysteriously placed there.

As we grew the magic died, yet so drawn are we to it, we wish we were able to suspend our critical thinking, though clearly we can’t.

I believe the same is true when we come to the magic and fantastic events of the Christmas stories. 

Some of the stories and the symbols at the very heart of the Christmas celebration are not even found in the biblical tradition. Thus, there is nothing for instance to tell us that Jesus was born in a stable, Matthew telling us rather the birthplace was a house.

The date, clearly, is a direct co-option of the Roman Saturnalia festival, shepherds hardly likely to be in the fields with sheep in the dead of winter.

Turning to the Christian Scriptures, the earliest writings, the epistles of Paul, and the Gospel of Mark, tell us nothing of the birth of Jesus, while when we arrive at the earliest accounts of Christmas in the gospels of Matthew and Luke they are almost entirely different, both quite incredible, making little sense to the modern mind. 

We can hardly believe in stars travelling at walking pace relative to the speed of the earth, virgin births, and angelic choruses, any more than we can in fairies at the bottom of the garden. 

We suspect that the birthplace of Jesus was moved from its real location in Nazareth to Bethlehem in entirely different means, so to fulfil the prophetic insistence that the Messiah must be born in that auspicious town of David, rather than in Nazareth, nowhere referred to in the Jewish Scriptures. 

To get Jesus to be born in Bethlehem, Matthew and Luke employ opposing means. Luke has an otherwise unknown census called to get the family, resident in Nazareth, to Bethlehem, in which place they are clearly secure, given their numerous public appearances, while Matthew has the family already resident in Bethlehem, from where they, being in mortal danger, must flee, first to Egypt, and then later to Nazareth. 

Virgin births are clearly unbelievable for us in an age of modern gynaecology, while to think that a king, Herod would be threatened in any way by the birth of a peasant infant, needs us again to suspend critical thinking. 

While clearly not factual, the Christmas stories tell us many things. They do so as myth, a word having nothing to do with falsehood, but rather with those types of truth beyond the factual, to do with meaning and significance. In such their profound truth is found.

In Jesus they claim, light has shone into the darkness, hence the star in Matthew and the radiant glory of the angelic chorus in Luke. 

Likewise his birth. It must be special, born of a virgin, something expected of significant figures in the ancient world, where divine-human liaisons were common, leading to the births of ‘the great.’ That greatness brings significant eastern visitors, ecstatic announcements by Simeon and Anna in the temple, and Herod’s fear.

This virgin birth, however, is different from the norm in antiquity in that the one through whom God procreates is a young woman from the lowest of classes. This special one born will announce a reign standing at such odds to the kingdoms of this world, that Herod, representative of these kingdoms must necessarily fear him, hence the massacre of the innocents, again for which there is no historical evidence, though such would not be beyond a tyrant, of whom Augustus, knowing of Herod’s murder of his wife, Mariamne and two sons, reportedly quipped, ‘It is better to be Herod’s pig than son.’ Kosher observance would prevent his pig suffering the fate of Herod’s family.

The writers by composing these incredible stories are affirming something they held to be deeply true; in Jesus God has come to us in a way of total identification, specifically with the poor and marginalised, those, like Jesus often forced onto the world’s roads and oceans as refugees.

The church was slow to celebrate Christmas, not doing so until the 4th century, but the season does catch a profound truth, if we can get beyond the unbelievable stories and sentimentality. Beyond that, we will grasp some of their deep significance.

In a season of heightened celebration, and even frivolity, of visiting friends and relatives, there are many who feel their suffering and loneliness more intensely. Familial tensions may explode into violence. Those working in welfare or mental health know this season as peak time.

This year near those places Jesus trod, violence and massacre is being unleashed at a horrendous level. The innocents are being slaughtered in numbers inconceivable to even Herod. Could there be a stronger contrast between the way of Jesus and those now in power in the land from where he came? Any Christmas celebration this year cannot help be affected by the agony and atrocity of Gaza. 

Christmas affirms God’s being with us in total identification and calls us likewise to be present to one another. 

Let that presence, especially to those most vulnerable and often despised, be that which motivates us this Christmas especially, for that is the essential truth to which these incredible stories point. In that the Divine is again made incarnate.

https://johnmenadue.com/christmas-beyond-the-fantastical/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST

 

HYPOCRISY ISN’T ONE OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS SINS.

HENCE ITS POPULARITY IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS…

 

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPhqMJpQsYQ

creating a legend....

First Council of Nicaea, (325), the first ecumenical council of the Christian church, meeting in ancient Nicaea (now İznikTurkey). It was called by the emperor Constantine I, an unbaptized catechumen, who presided over the opening session and took part in the discussions. He hoped a general council of the church would solve the problem created in the Eastern church by Arianism, a heresy first proposed by Arius of Alexandria that affirmed that Christ is not divine but a created being. Pope Sylvester I did not attend the council but was represented by legates.

The council condemned Arius and, with reluctance on the part of some, incorporated the nonscriptural word homoousios (“of one substance”) into a creed to signify the absolute equality of the Son with the Father. The emperor then exiled Arius, an act that, while manifesting a solidarity of church and state, underscored the importance of secular patronage in ecclesiastical affairs.

 

The council attempted but failed to establish a uniform date for Easter. It issued decrees on many other matters, including the proper method of consecrating bishops, a condemnation of lending money at interest by clerics, and a refusal to allow bishops, priests, and deacons to move from one church to another. It also confirmed the primacy of Alexandria and Jerusalem over other sees in their respective areas. Socrates Scholasticus, a 5th-century Byzantinehistorian, said that the council intended to make a canon enforcing celibacy of the clergy, but it failed to do so when some objected.

 

READ MORE:

https://www.britannica.com/event/First-Council-of-Nicaea-325

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST

 

HYPOCRISY ISN’T ONE OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS SINS.

HENCE ITS POPULARITY IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS…

 

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME YOURSELF.