Wednesday 15th of January 2025

a prime minister and an opposition leader vying to influence the mad king....

A week out from the presidential inauguration in Washington and what stands out is the sheer mischief and wildness of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, like two schoolboys running amok in the tuckshop of world politics.

With it comes a wide range of reactions to Trump, from the cheerleaders to those who fear Trump’s words may actually have meaning.

 

Who can best manage Trump – Albanese or Dutton?    By James Curran

 

What can we make of this other than a plea for Canberra to exercise caution and guile? What we have instead is the absurd posturing of the prime minister and opposition leader on who is best fitted to influence the mad king.

Last week, Trump flourished the right and ability of the US to intervene in Canada, Panama and Greenland. Headline-grabbing, yes, but is this the forewarning of the new style of American empire?

Trump affects to disdain the neoconservative attempt at imperial overreach in Iraq under George W. Bush, where democracy promotion came with the butt of a rifle.

Yet his rhetoric, while eschewing talk of freedom and nation building, is still about wielding imperial power carelessly and certainly unsubtly. Its message can be simply summarised: get out of America’s way.

Does Trump realise, however, that these are White House words from Mar-a-Lago and that White House words have consequences?

They will be received, especially in Beijing and Moscow by Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, as timely rhetorical precedent if not endorsement for their own big power behaviour over Ukraine and Taiwan. And it must fuel their assumption that the US is going to throw its military weight around.

This is all very intimidating until they make some cool calculations of the limits to US military power. Could this lead to casual nuclear threats? Putin and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un have form on this already.

Elon Musk, meanwhile, appears to have carte blanche to say whatever he wants, calling for an end to Keir Starmer’s British Labour government and bolstering the far-right Alternative for Germany in the elections there next month.

There are some in Australia, in the more extreme conservative circles and probably some in the national security establishment, who will be amused by and condone this mischief-making.

Yet put Musk and Trump together, along with their carelessness, ignorance and contempt for facts and policy, and it appears to fit the fears that many hold for what the next four years portend for American power and capability.

We now have benchmarks on which to measure Trump once he takes office. The Ukraine war will be settled within a day, there will be “hell to pay” if Hamas doesn’t release Israeli hostages in Gaza, tariffs on China could reach 200 per cent, and Canada could become the 51st state.

An unedifying spectacle

Australia’s reaction since Trump won the election is curious: demands that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rush to Florida to get Trump’s ear; earnest self-reassurance that Canberra will escape a Trump tariff target on its back; conviction born of hope that AUKUS will survive at its present costly level and not have added “tariffs” to it.

But the Australian public is now witness to an even more unedifying spectacle: that of Albanese and Peter Dutton competing as to who can best manage Trump.

That has grown in intensity since the resignation of Canadian leader Justin Trudeau who, on top of his inability to handle a cost of living crisis, was widely portrayed as feebled by Trump’s taunts and tariff threats.

Albanese last week sent a stiff message to the Trumpians, saying he will not change Australian policy on China and that “we believe in free trade, not protectionism”. This is defiance but not guile. Silence now and private back-channel dealings over policy as it is developed after inauguration would be wiser. Just as hairy-chested confrontation with China yielded no dividends, the Australian embassy in Washington should be circling Congress, advising of Australia’s interest and the essential nature of the Pine Gap base and others to US security.

The China hawks in the Trump administration might otherwise take on Albanese’s bon mots and be tempted to up the ante on Canberra.

Albanese then boasted that his relationships with Asian leaders would carry weight with the Trump White House. It is a spurious claim. Trump will not have the slightest interest in picking Albanese’s brain on Asian leaders. His next claim was that Dutton “has not developed relationships with other people around our region and around the world”, forgetting that Dutton is a former defence minister who worked with the first Trump administration.

The Trumpians should not have any concerns about a Dutton government – certainly nothing to rival the concern felt by Kurt Campbell and others in the Biden White House who after Albanese won the election in 2022, required extraordinary — and personal — reassurance that Labor could be trusted on the alliance.

Dutton did not need to take Albanese’s bait. He did. But his counterarguments were every bit as thin as his opponent’s, citing Labor’s voting record in the UN on Israel as evidence of a “split” between Canberra and Washington, and exhuming Albanese’s past “juvenile and undergraduate comments” about Trump.

The joust had echoes of claims and counterclaims between Billy McMahon and Gough Whitlam in the early 1970s on who could better manage Washington. Or those between John Howard and Mark Latham in 2004. It never ends well for either leader.

McMahon’s claims to be on better terms with Nixon were laid bare as the Republican president went to China without telling him – or anybody else.

Whitlam was later shut out from the Nixon White House for six months due to Washington’s outrage at his government’s criticism of the US president’s Vietnam policies.

And in 2004, Latham’s potshots at alliance “suckholes” was followed by an earnest press conference of apology standing aside the Stars and Stripes. Howard’s advisers winked at each other in the White House rose garden when President George W. Bush sent his own barb Latham’s way. But Howard’s foreign policy legacy manacled Australia to strategic failure in Iraq.

And the lesson here for Australia? Be wary of American adventures not in Australia’s national interest. Containment of China is just that sort of adventure, regardless of our genuine and understandable misgivings about the regime of Xi Jinping.

This article was first published in the Australian Financial Review

 

https://johnmenadue.com/who-can-best-manage-trump-albanese-or-dutton/

 

SEE ALSO: 

the YD continuum since 2005....

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME AMERICA.

 

dutton and teal....

Aspiring PM Peter Dutton could find himself in a three-cornered contest against Ali France and a Teal independent. Andrew Gardiner reports on Peter Dutton’s woman problem. 

Conservative commentator Andrew Bolt sees 2025 as “the year woke finally dies,” the Albanese Labor government one of many to be drowned, he predicts, in a tsunami of culture war conflict and economic angst. 

“America has already swung right; next will be Germany and Canada in elections this year (plus) Australia, too, in our own election in probably April or May,” Bolt foresaw. 

But are Bolt and the man he sees surfing this purported tsunami into The Lodge, Peter Dutton, getting ahead of themselves? Dutton, the member for marginal Dickson in Brisbane’s north west, will for the first time face a Teal independent candidate for the seat. MWM has learnt the candidate is expected to be announced on January 27.

Dutton’s Labor opponent in Dickson, Ali France, came within a little over 3,000 votes of victory, two-party preferred (2PP), at the 2022 federal election. 

The seat’s marginal status renders the Teal candidate a real threat to Dutton’s career as an MP (less as an aspiring PM) potentially siphoning moderate LNP voters away from him on what many see as his ‘Achilles heel’ issues: the treatment of women, the environment and – notably – honesty in politics. 

PM in waiting 

Bolt’s ‘PM-in-waiting’ in fact faces a make-or-break 2025. While Dutton will be comforted by a national 2PP swing of 2.4 per cent to the coalition in polls over the past 18 months, Queensland was by far the LNP’s strongest state in 2022, producing a ‘ceiling affect’ that has capped gains there to roughly half the national average

In Dickson (Qld.) that number could be dwarfed by Dutton’s haemorrhaging of votes to the Teals, meaning he must fight on two fronts, including a rearguard action in Dickson. After all, in our Westminster system of government, you can’t be PM if you’re not an MP. 

John Howard is testament to that.

Like other groups promoting a community independent, Dickson Decides sells itself as a grassroots movement with the goal of bringing “transparent, community-focused representation to Dickson”. According to sources, the group is founded on community engagement principles and eschews ‘party politics as usual,’ adhering broadly to policies promoting the environment and integrity in government.   

Locally, it’s expected Dutton’s opponents will call him out on the issue of honesty in politics. As Michael Bradley of Marque Lawyers points out, Dutton “says things that are objectively untrue, things he cannot possibly believe (and) he does so often, with increasing frequency and flagrancy”.

Dutton’s opponents can be expected to exploit this directly at the mid-campaign Dickson debate for which they will be pushing. How it plays with locals in an electorate of contrasting surrounds and demographics may ultimately determine who wins the seat. 

Environment, women, integrity, nuclear

On the environment, readers are no doubt aware of Dutton’s spruiking what he calls the ‘net zero’ option of nuclear energy, to be delivered by seven proposed nuclear power plants and two small modular reactors at a cost of $331 billion, with a promised reduction in power bills of 44 per cent

His opponents say Dutton’s numbers are based on flawed modelling, “won’t pass the pub test” and will prolong our dependence on energy from fossil fuels

How does this debate impact the result in Dickson? In a Redbridge survey taken last year, women strongly disapproved of lifting bans on nuclear power (men not so much) with Dutton’s opponents counting on a large number of women ‘defecting’ from LNP to ‘Teal’ and withholding their preferences from him.    

Therein lies Dutton’s biggest problem: women, both across Australia and locally. In a three cornered Dickson contest against two female opponents including the popular and accomplished Ali France (Labor) Dutton’s many stumbles on women’s issues will be centre stage locally during the campaign.  

Remember Dutton’s ‘she said, he said’ comments regarding Brittany Higgins, his description of journalist Samantha Maiden (above) as a “mad f___ing witch,” or his claim that refugee women were “trying it on” with rape claims as part of a ploy to get to Australia? Women remember stuff like that, and it may cost him

Where the money is

Those keen to write Dutton’s Dickson epitaph need to keep in mind both his survival skills and, now, his billionaire ‘ace in the hole’. Dutton has won this marginal seat at eight straight elections since 2001, utilising an array of clever methods over the journey, and has recently forged a powerful relationship with the wealthiest Australian, Gina Rinehart. 

Illustrating what some call his fealty to the Hancock Prospecting matriarch, Dutton has as Opposition Leader: 

  • travelled to the Pilbara as Rinehart’s guest (June 2022); 
  • flown to Sydney courtesy of Rinehart to (he says) attend a Bali bombing memorial (October 2022);  
  • jetted, courtesy of billionaire Tim Roberts, to a Rinehart party at Roy Hill in WA (November 2023, see photo above) and, most remarkably: 
  • taken time out from an important Melbourne by-election campaign for a 40 minute Perth pit stop at Rinehart’s birthday party (March 2024).  

That’s quite a friendship, in which Rinehart “appears to have been rewarded with a key role in developing what passes for Dutton’s policy positions”, wrote Crikey’s Bernard Keane. 

Dividends include Dutton’s embrace of Rinehart-supported policies like an increase in the income threshold pensioners can earn without losing payments, migration cuts and, of course, the spruiking of nuclear energy. 

Doing a Josh

Anyone prepared to turn Rinehart’s most coveted outcomes into government policy can likely count on substantial support should, say, his seat be under real threat from a pesky, Teal-clad booster of “bird-killing wind generators and massive solar panel stretches”. Certainly, sources close to the Teal campaign expect as much. 

“There’s no depth to which (Rinehart’s) pockets don’t reach. I expect saturation advertising – just like Kooyong in 2022 – if it’s close,” one source told MWM.  

In many respects, Dickson in 2025 does indeed mirror Kooyong (Victoria) three years ago. Back then, Josh Frydenberg, an aspiring Liberal Prime Minister beloved by big time donors, found himself caught in the cyclonic headwinds of another Teal-adorned grassroots movement. 

In Dickson, we see all these elements and more, with Australia’s society (and environment) at a clearly-defined crossroads and one candidate – Dutton – determined to take a hard right turn.

The people v the money

“It’s the biggest campaign in the country, with an unprecedented ability to attract volunteers and donors, made even spicier by the fact Dutton divides us like few others,” a Teal source told MWM.  

Three years ago, money poured into Kooyong to save Frydenberg, but this came at the expense of other, needy electorates where it might have been better-spent. Could the LNP and its backers make the same mistake twice?  

“That’s the bonus, even if we happen to lose in Dickson,” the source told MWM. “There are community independents running in 36 seats across Australia and no matter how many oligarchs chip in to stop us, their resources are finite.” 

“We, on the other hand, rely on people power, and there’s no shortage of volunteers ready to work for us.”  

MWM sought comment from the Teal, Dutton and France campaigns, but had not heard back by publication time.  

https://michaelwest.com.au/duttons-dickson-teal-challenge-for-election/

 

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

HYPOCRISY ISN’T ONE OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS SINS.

HENCE ITS POPULARITY IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS…

 

 

PLEASE DO NOT BLAME RUSSIA IF WW3 STARTS. BLAME AMERICA.

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

SEE ALSO: 

the YD continuum since 2005....