Christmas in America: Staggering wealth concentration and deepening social crisis

by Jerry White

As Christmas approaches and the year comes to an end, Trump administration officials are pointing to headlines about GDP growth and a soaring stock market to support the president’s absurd claim that Americans are enjoying the “greatest economy in the history of our country.” Behind these figures lies a sharply “K‑shaped” social reality: spectacular gains in wealth and consumption for the affluent, while tens of millions of workers confront stagnant real wages, mounting debt, mass layoffs, evictions, utility shutoffs and preventable deaths.

The past year has, in fact, seen a further concentration of wealth to levels that are unprecedented in modern history. Over the past year, billionaires in the US, consisting of 900 individuals, increased their wealth by a staggering 18 percent, to a record $6.9 trillion this year. Ten individuals alone increased their wealth by $750 billion. No figure embodies this obscene spectacle more than Elon Musk, whose net worth surged by over $500 billion in just two years, to reach $749 billion—more than the GDP of entire countries.

At the other pole of society, a recent AP/NORC poll shows that most Americans are concerned about rising prices for groceries, electricity and holiday gifts, with nearly half delaying major or non-essential purchases and searching for the lowest prices. Many are also racking up debt through “buy now, pay later” apps such as Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, PayPal, and Zip.

A Politico poll released in November found that more than a quarter of the population, 27 percent, said they had skipped a medical check-up due to cost, and nearly one in four reported skipping a prescribed medication for the same reason.

The Trump administration ended the year by giving those with student debt a “Christmas gift” in the form of ending the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) student loan forgiveness program, which had reduced or eliminated payments for more than 7 million borrowers. Starting early next year, the government will resume aggressive collections and wage garnishments for those in default.

The immense social chasm is particularly stark in Detroit, where the supposed revival from municipal bankruptcy more than a decade ago has been hailed by the corporate media and the city’s Democratic Party establishment.

This Christmas, Detroit’s downtown business district—home to the new GM corporate headquarters, luxury residential towers and sports arenas—is brightly lit for the holidays. Just blocks away, homeless men sleep beside steam pipes in the Greektown entertainment district to keep warm. It was here, in a casino parking lot, that two small children died from carbon monoxide poisoning inside their mother’s car in February 2025, after city and state agencies refused aid to their homeless family.

At the Leland House—one of the few remaining downtown buildings where low-income families could afford rent after most subsidized housing was shuttered or converted to “market rate” units—scores of residents have been forced from their homes in the dead of winter.

After a grassroots fundraising effort raised enough money to pay an overdue DTE Energy bill owed by the property managers, the building’s basement electrical system was flooded under suspicious circumstances. Fire officials then ordered an emergency evacuation.

The tenants—many elderly and on fixed incomes—remain displaced weeks later, have been denied access to retrieve personal belongings and face the likely loss of their homes. Local reporting shows the property owners neglected critical infrastructure, municipal responses were slow and inadequate, and residents are left uncertain. As one long‑term tenant put it: “They don’t want people like me living downtown. They’re creating a new downtown. That’s what they want.”  

The city’s long dominant Democratic Party political establishment has overseen this process. The Detroit Downtown Development Authority approved up to $5 million in public funds toward renovations at Little Caesars Arena to accommodate a new WNBA basketball franchise. Detroit City Council approved roughly $40 million in brownfield tax‑increment financing for a practice facility at the former Uniroyal Tire factory site. 

These funds are derived from “captured” property taxes in the downtown district that would otherwise support critical social services. While tenants are displaced and utilities are shut off, the DDA and city council provide direct public subsidies to benefit billionaire developers like Dan Gilbert and the Ilitch family. 

Workers in the Motor City’s auto industry are feeling the same brutal priorities. At GM’s Factory Zero—once promoted as the centerpiece of an electric‑vehicle future—1,145 assembly workers are being permanently laid off as the plant was cut to a single shift. These layoffs followed months of forced overtime and temporary shutdowns. GM continues to post record profits and return billions to investors even as it eliminates jobs and consolidates operations, moving into new multi‑million‑dollar downtown headquarters owned by Dan Gilbert. 

This pattern is repeated across the US and around the world. The closure of Tyson’s Lexington, Nebraska plant will cost about 3,200 jobs in a town of 11,000. Across the United States, over 1 million job‑cut announcements have been recorded this year. AI and digital technologies are deployed to boost productivity and carry out mass layoffs across industries.

There is growing anger in the working class, which possesses enormous social power. Supply chains, transport, healthcare and public services cannot function without labor. The strategic task is to convert widespread opposition into an organizational and political counteroffensive in 2026.

The World Socialist Web Site and the International Workers Alliance of Rank‑and‑File Committees (IWA‑RFC) call for the formation of rank‑and‑file committees in every plant, workplace and neighborhood to demand an immediate halt to permanent layoffs; full pay and benefits for affected workers; and shortened working weeks with no loss of pay to preserve jobs.

These committees should demand a ban on utility shutoffs and mass evictions; cancellation of predatory debt and an end to wage garnishment for student loan defaulters; and the reversal of public subsidies to billionaire projects in favor of massive public investment in housing, healthcare and services.

An industrial counteroffensive must be connected to a political struggle against the Trump administration—a government of, by and for the oligarchy. Trump is erecting a presidential dictatorship, the political form that corresponds to a society riven by staggering levels of social inequality. The vicious, fascistic campaign against immigrant workers, including Gestapo-style raids and the rounding up of entire families, is the spearhead for a broader attack on the democratic rights of the entire working class.

The Democratic Party has refused to mount any opposition, as it agrees with the main elements of Trump’s social program. Just one month ago, the Democratic Socialists of America mayor-elect of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, met with Trump at the White House, smiled for photos, and declared his readiness to work with the fascist president. 

It is not a question of tinkering around the edges of a bankrupt economic and political system, but mobilizing the immense power of the working class in an irreconcilable fight against the entire corporate and financial oligarchy. This fight must be waged independently of—and in opposition to—both capitalist parties and the corrupt union bureaucracies, which serve as enforcers for the corporations and the state. The trade unions seek to divide workers along national lines and disarm them in the face of a historic offensive against jobs, wages and democratic rights.

The program of this counteroffensive must be the expropriation of the financial and corporate elite, the socialization of the major industries, and the use of modern technology to eliminate poverty, guarantee decent housing and healthcare and raise the material and cultural level of all humanity. The resources exist to guarantee full employment, housing, healthcare, and education for all. The question is: Who controls these resources—the oligarchy or the working class?

The answer depends on building a revolutionary socialist leadership, rooted in the working class and guided by a clear political program. The Socialist Equality Party and the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees are fighting to develop this leadership and to organize the growing resistance of workers and youth throughout the world.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/12/24/lcoe-d24.html

READ FROM TOP.

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUPxCrkZNZk

00:00 Epstein files release is a mess
00:44 Files being pulled after Trump’s name appears
01:14 Fake Epstein suicide note to Larry Nassar
03:04 Trump world insiders grade DOJ handling an F-minus
03:33 Release fuels suspicion of a cover-up
05:58 Fake evidence “poisoning the well” for entire release

Prem Thakker is a reporter at Zeteo News. He was previously a politics reporter at The Intercept, and is a former reporter at The New Republic. His work has also appeared in The American Prospect, Washington Monthly, CNN podcasts, and his newsletter Better World.

READ FROM TOP.

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AttEbmcdnIo

Danny and Larry Johnson argue that recent U.S. rhetoric and military posturing toward Venezuela is reckless and deeply dangerous. Mike Waltz publicly labeled Nicolás Maduro as an illegitimate leader, a fugitive from U.S. justice, and the head of a drug cartel, while stating that President Trump is prepared to use the full military power of the United States to destroy such cartels. Combined with reports that roughly 15% of the U.S. Navy is positioned near Venezuela, the speaker sees this as laying the rhetorical and diplomatic groundwork for military action.

The critique is that this approach is based on bravado rather than serious planning. The speaker warns that Trump believes he can “kill his way out” of complex political problems, a strategy that would likely devastate his presidency and cause massive Venezuelan civilian casualties and U.S. military losses. Venezuela, they argue, could become far worse than Iraq or Afghanistan due to its size, jungle terrain, mountains, borders with Brazil and Colombia, and the ease with which an insurgency could form.

Drawing on past U.S. failures, the speaker cites Trump’s Red Sea campaign against the Houthis—portrayed as a decisive success but in reality marked by heavy losses, abandoned objectives, and no real change on the ground—as well as exaggerated claims about “obliterating” Iran. These examples are used to show that Trump has no clear record of successful military interventions.

The speaker stresses that naval power, blockades, or small numbers of elite troops cannot control Venezuela. Special forces have limited capabilities in conventional or counterinsurgency warfare, and even massive troop deployments in Vietnam and Afghanistan failed to control territory. In jungle warfare, U.S. forces would be highly vulnerable to ambushes and shoulder-fired missiles, with insufficient troop numbers even to secure basic supply routes.

Finally, the speaker challenges the legal and moral justification for attacking Venezuela. Even if Venezuela is a major drug trafficking route (as cited from a UN report), that does not legally authorize a U.S. attack. The argument is that the U.S. routinely ignores international law when convenient, selectively defines threats, and applies double standards—especially given drug production and trafficking realities in Mexico and Afghanistan, including past U.S. complicity. Overall, the speaker concludes that claims of legality and rule-based order are a hollow “fig leaf” masking dangerous, hypocritical, and poorly thought-out military escalation.

=========================

READ FROM TOP.

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.