Saturday 28th of February 2026

magic: you see the fire, you did not see the trick....

The Federal Reserve has appointed longtime Wall Street lawyer Randall Guynn as its new director of supervision and regulation – a move critics say risks entrenching industry influence at the heart of financial oversight, a move that one critic said was worse than “putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.”

 

Jake Johnson

‘Arsonist as Fire Chief’: Fed appoints Wall Street lobbyist to key bank oversight role

 

“This is like appointing a lifelong arsonist as a fire chief,” Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO of Better Markets, said in response to the Fed’s decision to put Randall Guynn in a position to regulate the industry he has long represented.

Politico  reported Tuesday that “Guynn, a prominent Wall Street lawyer, will become the next director of supervision and regulation at the Federal Reserve, effective 8 March.”

Before joining Fed staff last year as an adviser to the central bank’s vice chair for supervision, Guynn worked for close to four decades at the corporate law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell, where he recently chaired the company’s Financial Institutions Group. According to Guynn’s  bio, he has “focused on advising banks of all sizes on their most critical financial regulatory issues and transactions.”

Reuters, which first  reported earlier this month that the Fed was expected to appoint Guynn to the bank policing role, noted that the decision “would mark a departure for the central bank, which since at least 1977 has filled the job with long-serving Fed career staff.”

In a  statement, Kelleher of Better Markets described Guynn as a “lawyer-lobbyist” who has “spent his entire professional life – almost 40 years – zealously and exclusively representing the interests of the financial industry, including the biggest financial firms on Wall Street.”

A 2024  paper published in Cambridge University’s Perspectives on Politics journal identified Guynn as part of a “vast subterranean world of regulatory influence-seeking” that has managed to escape the scrutiny of legislative lobbying.

“Reporting exceptions under the Lobbying Disclosure Act allow many of the most powerful advocates to characterise their activity as lawyering, not lobbying, and thereby fly under the radar,” the paper notes.

Kelleher argued that, given Guynn’s history, “the only reasonable expectation is that his leadership of Fed supervision and regulation will accelerate the Fed’s current push to implement policies that favour the biggest, most dangerous banks – his former clients just 10 months ago and presumably his current circle of professional and personal friends.”

“That will crush small banks, harm the Main Street economy, and make another financial crash inevitable. That’s what happened in the early 2000s when the Fed’s misguided belief that Wall Street could regulate itself directly led to the catastrophic 2008 crash,” said Kelleher. “We don’t have to speculate. We can look at his attached record or read the remarkable story of how, as a lawyer-lobbyist prior to joining the Fed staff last year, he was instrumental in pushing through a  back-door merger approval by the Fed.”

“There can be little doubt that having a Wall Street lawyer-lobbyist in charge of supervising and regulating his former Wall Street clients will likely result in a catastrophe for the American people,” he added.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/fed-wall-street-lobbyist

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

unhealthy USA....

 

‘One Year of Failure’: The Lancet Warns RFK Jr.’s Assault on Science May ‘Take Generations to Repair
Kennedy has “made a habit of throwing good money after bad” by promoting “junk science and fringe beliefs.”

BY BRAD REED

 

A scathing editorial published Friday in one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals took US Health and Human ServicesSecretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to task for what it described as “one year of failure.”

In its editorial, the Lancet began by listing off several of the broken promises Kennedy made during his first speech after being confirmed to lead the US Health and Human Services Department (HHS), such as his vow to have “open and honest engagement with everyone willing to work towards making the USA healthy again” and usher in “a new era of unbiased science without hidden conflicts of interest, secrecy, or profiteering.”

In fact, the Lancet found that it took Kennedy less than two weeks to break a key promise.

“Ten days after his speech about trust and openness,” the journal noted, “HHS rescinded a 54-year-old policy of soliciting public comments for new rules and regulations, silencing the voices of many of the stakeholders he pledged to serve.”

Things have only gotten worse since then, the editorial continued, as Kennedy has shelved research into mRNA vaccines and “made a habit of throwing good money after bad” by promoting “junk science and fringe beliefs.”

The editorial concluded by warning “the destruction that Kennedy has wrought in one year might take generations to repair, and there is little hope for US health and science while he remains at the helm.” The journal urged the US Congress to “hold Kennedy accountable for his record, or else accept responsibility for endorsing President Trump’s decision to let him ‘run wild on health.’”

The Lancet editorial drew a range of reactions from medical experts and academics.

Scott Forbes, an ecologist at the University of Winnipeg, explained the significance of a journal such as the Lancet publishing such an overtly political editorial.

“For context, the Lancet is one of the two most important medical journals on the planet,” he wrote in a social media post. “When they put this on their front cover, it is only because there is something seriously wrong. That something is RFK Jr. He is a notorious crank and charlatan. But that’s par for the course in the Trump regime.”

Forbes’ point was echoed by Krutika Kuppalli, associate professor at UT Southwestern Medical Center’s Department of Internal Medicine.

“When a leading medical journal uses language like this, it’s not rhetoric,” she wrote. “It’s a warning the world should take seriously.”

Pediatrician Vincent Iannelli took the Lancet to task for publishing a since-retracted study in 1998 that falsely linked vaccination with the development of autism, which subsequently helped the anti-vaccination movement gain currency.

“Let’s not forget that Wakefield’s fraudulent paper that was published in the Lancet helped get us on this road,” Iannelli said. “RFK Jr. was influenced by mothers who blamed vaccines for their child’s autism.”

https://www.commondreams.org/news/rfk-jr-lancet-editorial

 

READ FROM TOP....

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.