Sunday 28th of April 2024

just another sorry prime minister ......

another sorry prime minister .....

The moral bankruptcy of our new cardboard cutout Prime Minister has been revealed to all those with eyes that see. 

Yesterday, slavishly abetted by the feeble & inept ‘leader’ of the opposition, Brendan Nelson, Kevin Rudd perpetrated one of the most shameful & immoral acts ever committed in our nation’s Parliament, casting a stain on our country & its people. 

The behavior of Rudd & Nelson was something that most of us had come to expect from the miserable creature from Wollstonecraft, before the irresistible stench of his character & behavior could no longer be tolerated by the decent majority of this nation’s citizens. 

Indeed, Rudd & Nelson yesterday demonstrated exactly how little difference there really is between the phonies who attach themselves like leeches to our nation’s treasury, intent on serving only their interests & those of their hidden sponsors. 

Yes, based on yesterday’s performance, both Rudd & Nelson showed how right at home they would have been on centre stage with the wholly discredited rattus at last week’s American Enterprise Institute Dinner – three wicked peas from the same evil pod. 

Yesterday, Rudd put forward a motion praising Israel as a ‘custodian of freedom’ in the middle east, ignoring its obscene 60 year record of brutal oppression against the people of Palestine & those Palestinian citizens of Israel who have the misfortune to live there as second class citizens.

For those who might doubt this truth, take the time to read the recent report released by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, exposing the shocking racism in the Jewish state, where 50% of Israelis said they would not live in the same buildings as Arabs or allow Arabs to enter their homes.

Whilst Rudd & Nelson lauded the Zionist criminals who run the fascist state of Israel, its political leaders were busy this week announcing the construction of more illegal settlements in the West Bank.

To quote Antony Loewenstein in today’s Crikey:

‘The bipartisan motion to celebrate Israel’s 60th anniversary was a predictably tawdry affair. Meaningless platitudes about "democracy", "freedom" and a "two-state solution" were reminiscent of any speech by US President George W. Bush or The Australian Greg Sheridan’s recent foray into Israeli Foreign Ministry talking points, "Deep inside the plucky country".

For a PM who has called himself "passionately pro-Israel", Rudd was never likely to question the appropriateness of endorsing a position that offends the majority Muslim population, many Jews, myself included and millions of other Australians. Barely a few weeks after Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generations, his compassion towards another people who suffered dispossession and ethnic cleansing, the Palestinians, was glaringly absent.

Hundreds of concerned Australians appeared in a Palestinian-initiated advertisement in The Australian yesterday – unionists, academics, journalists and Jews – and stated that "Australia and Australians should not give the Israeli people and its leaders the impression that Australia supports them in their dispossession of the Palestinian people." I was a signatory of the petition.’

Whilst Rudd & Nelson busied themselves fouling the nation’s Parliament with their rank hypocrisy, many of their Parliamentary colleagues thankfully absented themselves.

And one said outright that she had boycotted the event.

Backbencher, Julia Irwin, spoke out in yesterday's Labour caucus meeting & refused to attend the Parliamentary session.

‘Look, I find it hard to congratulate a country which carries out human rights abuses each day & shows blatant disregard for the United Nations. I'm disappointed that there was no mention of the human rights abuses that Israel do against the Palestinians on a daily basis. I most definitely felt that the Palestinian cause is being ignored’, said Irwin.

And whilst the ever pathetic Nelson asserted …..

‘For any Australian who has not done so, who has the privilege and the opportunity to visit Washington, I urge them to visit the Holocaust Museum, and there is a very large sign out the front of the museum that says, "Never forget what you have seen here".

The piles of shoes that were worn by Jews exterminated, photographs of men and women and children looking out into lives that were never lived, and many other things to remind us of why our relationship with Israel and our respect for the Israeli cause and the two-state solution, is so important to our own beliefs, our own values, and ultimately, our own freedoms and security.’

Irwin observed …..

‘I have walked through refugee camps in Palestine, I have cried with those people, I have seen the children, the men, the women, the elderly. I have been to the Holocaust Museum in Israel, and I cried. I did cry. But that is in the past, we have got to look at the future, we have got to look at the future of Israel and the Palestinians.

The evidence of Rudd’s disgusting behaviour can be found below in the text of his motion to Parliament …..

60th ANNIVERSARY OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL  

House of Representatives

Australian Parliament

12 March 2008  

Mr RUDD (Griffith—Prime Minister) (11.58 am)—

by leave—I move:  

That the House:  

1.                  celebrate and commend the achievements of the State of Israel in the 60 years since its inception;

2.                  remember with pride and honour the important role which Australia played in the establishment of the State of Israel as both a member state of the United Nations and as an influential voice in the introduction of Resolution 181 which facilitated Israel’s statehood, and as the country which proudly became the first to cast a vote in support of Israel’s creation;

3.                  acknowledge the unique relationship which exists between Australia and Israel; a bond highlighted by our commitment to the rights and liberty of our citizens and encouragement of cultural diversity;

4.                  commend the State of Israel’s commitment to democracy, the Rule of Law and pluralism;

5.                  reiterate Australia’s commitment to Israel’s right to exist and our ongoing support to the peaceful establishment of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian issue;

6.                  reiterate Australia’s commitment to the pursuit of peace and stability throughout the Middle East;

7.                  on this, the 60th Anniversary of Independence of the State of Israel, pledge our friendship, commitment and enduring support to the people of Israel as we celebrate this important occasion together.  

Today the parliament of Australia notes the occasion of this year, being the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the state of Israel.  

The story of the establishment of the state of Israel begins with the unimaginable tragedy of the Holocaust. At the Holocaust memorial at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem the words of the Australian delegate to the 1938 Evian Conference are recorded. He said that Australia could not encourage refugee immigration because, ‘as we have no real racial problem, we are not desirous of importing one’. Thankfully, later in 1938 the Australian government took the decision to admit 15,000 Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany. But by the time the war began only 6,500 had reached Australia.  

By war’s end, six million Jews had been murdered. By war’s end, the international community finally began to look again in earnest at the question of a homeland for the Jewish people. Australia is proud to have played a significant part in the international process that led to the foundation of the state of Israel. Australia’s then Minister for External Affairs, Dr Evatt, was part of the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine, which recommended in August 1947 the termination of the Mandate for Palestine. And he was chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting on the Palestinian Question that proposed the partition of Palestine. He strongly believed that the fundamental right of self-determination for the Jewish people and for Palestinians could only be achieved by each having their own state.  

The resolution that the United Nations adopted in November 1947 reflected that. It proposed the establishment of two independent states—one Arab and one Jewish. And Australia was the first state in the historic vote of the international community on that resolution to cast its vote in support of the modern state of Israel. On 14 May 1948 David Ben-Gurion declared the foundation of the modern state of Israel.  

Prime Minister Ben Chifley, too, was closely involved in Australia’s policy towards Israel. In June 1948 he reinforced Evatt’s strong support for a two state solution when he cabled British Prime Minister Clement Attlee and urged early recognition of Israel, saying that: policy towards Israel. In June 1948 he reinforced Evatt’s strong support for a two state solution when he cabled British Prime Minister Clement Attlee and urged early recognition of Israel, saying that:  

Such [a] declaration would properly indicate willingness to agree in principle to the recognition of the Provisional Government of Israel, and at the same time willingness to recognise de facto the Arab authorities in actual control of Arab Sections of Palestine.  

On 29 January 1949 he announced that Australia would become one of the first countries to recognise the new state of Israel, describing it as ‘a force of special value in the world community’. As President of the General Assembly ‘Doc’ Evatt then presided over the historic May 1949 vote admitting Israel as the 59th member of the United Nations. On 11 May 1949 the Chifley Labor government opened an embassy in Tel Aviv. Evatt later said that, when working on the question of Israel, he wanted to ensure that the ‘new State of Israel, whose people had in the past done so much for humanity, would be welcomed, not merely formally but with good heart and good conscience’ into the international community.  

The 60 years since the establishment of Israel have been full of challenges and full of trials. Similarly, the process for the emergence of a Palestinian state has come along a torturous path. There has been too much bloodshed. But over those 60 years there has also been cause for hope.  

We think today of Prime Minister Menachem Begin standing with President Jimmy Carter and Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat, at the White House on March 26 1979 at the signing of the Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty that followed from the Camp David Accords. Prime Minister Begin used both the Hebrew and Arabic words for peace when he urged: ‘No more war, no more bloodshed, no more bereavement. Peace unto you. Shalom, salaam, forever.’ We can think, too, of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, shaking hands with his lifelong enemy Yasser Arafat on the lawns of the White House on September 13 1993, saying: September 13 1993, saying:

We, the soldiers who have returned from battles stained with blood; we who have seen our relatives and friends killed before our eyes; we who have attended their funerals and cannot look in the eyes of their parents; we who have come from a land where parents bury their children; we who have fought against you, the Palestinians—we say to you, in a loud and clear voice, enough of blood and tears. Enough!  

All peoples of goodwill yearn for that vision to be realised. It has not been realised yet. To borrow again from former Yitzhak Rabin, a man who tragically paid the ultimate price while pursuing peace ‘The risks of peace are preferable by far to the grim certainties of war’.  

We firmly believe the establishment of an independent and economically viable Palestinian state must remain a key objective in the Middle East peace process. This is important for the future. It was important in the vision of 1947. It remains the vision today, just as our objective must be for Israel to exist within secure and internationally recognised boundaries.  

Today, we in Australia support the ongoing negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority towards a final status agreement by the end of 2008, as launched at the Annapolis Conference in November last year. To support the establishment of a viable and sustainable Palestinian state Australia pledged a $45 million assistance package at the donors conference for the Palestinian territories in Paris on 18 December. Australia remains, as we have in the past, committed to an effective two-state solution.  

Over the past 60 years governments from both sides of politics in Australia have supported our strong relationship with Israel. That relationship is strong and it is deep—and it will remain so. Because we are both democracies, as democracies sometimes we will agree and sometimes we will disagree. That is in the nature of strong relationships. But the underlying friendship between us does not alter.  

Australia offers our congratulations to the government and people of Israel on this the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the modern Israeli state. We acknowledge our special history and relationship and we look forward to its continued strength and development into the future.  

I commend this motion to the House.  

Hansard Reference  

http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/reps/latesthansard/rhansard.pdf 

A true day of shame for Australia.

postscript .....

Alan Ramsey writes ….. 

That night, back on the floor of the House of Representatives, the woman MP who took Tim Fischer's southern NSW seat off the Nationals in 2001 and, in two elections, turned it into safe Liberal territory, did an extremely courageous thing. 

Her name is Sussan Penelope Ley. 

She is the daughter of a British colonial police officer who served in British-mandated Palestine in the 1930s, before the United Nations ceded half of it to become a Jewish state in May 1948. Born in Nigeria in 1961, Ley spent most of the first 13 years of her life in what was then the Trucial States, later the United Arab Emirates. Her family migrated to Australia in 1974. She has lived here ever since, working as an air traffic controller, a commercial pilot, a shearer's cook, a farmer, and a senior taxation department official. She has a bunch of degrees, three children and is now a member of the Nelson shadow ministry. 

What Sussan Ley did in Parliament on Wednesday night was speak for the Palestinian people. She was the only MP who did. In fact, the only MHR of the House's 150, apart from the two leaders, to even raise the issue. 

When Rudd and Nelson had spoken at midday I counted 53 Government MPs present, including six ministers, and 39 Coalition MPs. When Ley got the call 7½ hours later, at 7.38pm, to speak on the adjournment, there were five people in the public gallery, four Labor MPs and two Coalition MPs in the chamber, and one journalist in the press gallery. She was the fourth-last speaker before Parliament shut down for the day, after 11 hours, and she was allowed five minutes. 

Here is an edited version of what she said: 

"Today the Parliament passed a motion honouring Israel's 60 years. My purpose tonight is not to diminish Israel's achievements but to note the interests and legitimate aspirations of the people of Palestine. 

"Israel has many friends in this country and in this Parliament. The Palestinians, by comparison, have few. Theirs is not a popular cause. But it is one I support, in part out of knowledge that the victors of World War II, including Australia, wrote a 'homeland' cheque to cover the sins of the holocaust and centuries of anti-Semitism in Europe, but it was the Palestinians who had to cash it. 

"Israel has much to celebrate after 60 years. It has built a modern, accomplished and intelligent society, one whose scientific and technological expertise offers a great deal to the world. It has a robust democracy, a free press, a secular state with freedom of faith, and an unfettered opposition, regrettably rare in the Middle East. If there were peace between Israelis and Palestinians, one can only imagine the achievements of these two cultures today. 

"Israel's 40-year occupation of the Palestinian territories, its continued expansion of [illegal Israeli] settlements [on Palestinian land] and its refusal to allow the return of expelled refugees have caused deep resentment in the Arab world. Palestinian corruption in government and failure to abandon violence against civilians as a political tool have meant Israel does not feel secure behind secure borders. Sixty years have seen a great deal of bloodshed - Arab, Israeli and others, including 34 US soldiers killed by Israeli forces on the USS Liberty during the 1967 war. I do not find it helpful to engage in a forensic apportionment of blame; each side has legitimate grievances. 

"The current blockade of Gaza, confiscation of Palestinian land, and the expansion of settlements must be mentioned in the context of today's motion. Gaza is besieged, contained and on the brink of starvation. Rockets are fired into Israel every day, and Israel has a right to self-defence, but the crushing economic embargo feeds fury and resentment both in Gaza and the West Bank. [A total] 2679 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli [military] forces in the Gaza Strip since September 2000, [while] an Israeli human rights organisation reported 1259 of those were not participating in hostilities when they were killed, and 567 were minors … 

"We ought not be naive or simplistic about the challenge faced by the Israelis in moving towards peace with a [popularly elected] counterpart, in Hamas, that is funded and supported by a foreign power [Syria] and which retains an explicit commitment to [terrorism] as a political instrument. But may I remind the House of the example of the Northern Ireland peace process [which succeeded] after a more than 40-year struggle. 

"There are signs the Israeli people are developing a renewed hunger for peace. A recent Tel Aviv University poll indicates 64 per cent of Israelis believe the [Israeli] Government must hold direct talks with the Hamas government in Gaza towards a ceasefire. Military occupation, blockades and hostility against civilians in the name of security will result in [more] violence and terror. We must think what we can do [for] ordinary Israelis and Palestinians to give them some faith in the peace process … 

"We are the leaders of our generation. We are accountable for results. If the principal protagonists and the rest of the world community hand Palestine on to the next generation as a twisted mess of grievance, hatred and retribution, then we have failed. The last two generations of leaders have failed to produce peace. Let us renew our efforts.

" Unlike earlier in the day, nobody applauded - though I wished I could have. Many Australians, too, had they been present, surely would have wanted to acknowledge such a speech of such honesty and sensibility, about the Israelis as much as it was about the Palestinians. Ley put the grovelling Rudd and Nelson to shame. The truth is there is no real debate in this country about the travesty of what is happening in the Middle East, and there are those in the community who, with their money and influence, do all they can to ensure no such open debate occurs, either in the national Parliament, in the media or anywhere else. 

So why was the Rudd Government, in its first four months of office, doing what no Australian government or parliament had done, to acknowledge any of the decades of Israeli statehood since the Six-Day War in 1967 saw the Israeli military occupy the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and Gaza and ignore 40 years of mutual violence and barbarity as well as 40 years of United Nations resolutions, to withdraw? 

The Howard government did not "honour" Israel's 50th anniversary in 1998, nor the Hawke government the 40th anniversary in 1988, nor the Fraser government the 30th anniversary in 1978. Why the 60th in 2008 the instant a Labor Government comes to power? 

When the Labor caucus met on Tuesday, as it does every week the Parliament sits, Sydney's Julia Irwin asked Rudd this very question. 

Why? Irwin never takes a backward step in her defence of Palestinian rights, but all she got from Rudd this time was waffle. He did not explicitly respond as to why 60 might be different from earlier decades when the Parliament had done nothing and neither had earlier governments. And no Labor MP supported Irwin in pushing it. 

She was a lone voice in the Labor caucus as Sussan Ley was in the Parliament. How's that for political ticker? 

elsewhere ….. 

European Union Leaders on Friday condemned Israeli plans to build hundreds of new homes in a West Bank settlement & called on Israel to act swiftly to keep peace efforts alive. 

“The EU reiterates that settlement building anywhere in the occupied Palestinian Territories, including East Jerusalem, is illegal under international law,” the bloc’s presidency said in a statement after a summit of EU leaders. 

“Settlement activity prejudges the outcome of final status negotiations & threatens the viability of an agreed two-state solution. The European Council therefore urges Israel to take immediate action in particular on settlements & outposts,” the leaders said. 

Israel said on Sunday that plans to build a total of 750 homes in Givat Ze'ev, a settlement near Jerusalem, were being revived.  

The new building was announced three days after a Palestinian terrorist killed eight students at Mercaz Harav yeshiva in Jerusalem.  

EU leaders condemned that attack but said: "While recognizing Israel's legitimate right to self defense, the European Council calls for an immediate end to all acts of violence." 

EU Demands Israel Halt All Construction In West Bank

pretending to be a vibrant democratic state .....

from Crikey ….. 

Who cares, they're only Palestinians 

Greg Barns writes: 

If you are an Israeli citizen living in the West bank towns of Samaria and Judea and you beat up a Palestinian, even kill him or her, there’s a 90 percent chance you will get away with it. 

The latest Data Sheet from Israeli human rights group, Yesh Din, confirms what many have long suspected to be the case - that the system of law enforcement in Israel treats Palestinians in much the same way as black South Africans were treated by that country’s police force when the apartheid regime was in place. 

Yesh Din has tracked police 205 investigation files opened in recent years. 81 of these files relate to attacks on Palestinians by Israeli civilians and this includes two cases of shooting that led to death, and nine cases of serious injury. The remainder deal with incidents where Palestinians were assaulted with sticks, knives, rifle butts, as well as attacks on their houses and vehicles. 

Then there are 79 cases of criminal trespass which involve cutting down, uprooting and setting fire to Palestinian crops and stealing olives during the harvest season. The remainder of the cases involve theft and vandalising agricultural equipment.  

Yesh Din reports that of these 205 investigations "police processing and prosecutorial review have concluded in 163 files. Out of those 163, only in 13 (8%) of the cases were indictments filed against defendants. One case file was lost and never investigated, and 149 (91%) investigation files were closed without filing any indictments against suspects." 

And what reasons are given for the closure of a staggering 91 percent of files -- 91 were closed on grounds of "perpetrator unknown" (61%) and 43 cases were closed on grounds of "lack of evidence" (28%). 

The methods used in investigations by the Israeli Police in the Samaria and Judea districts are designed to ensure failure. Yesh Din observes that: 

...victims complaints and testimonies were recorded in Hebrew rather than Arabic, the language in which they were given; the police investigators rarely visited the crime scenes, and in the cases when they did arrive on site, defects were noted in documenting the events;

in many cases testimony was not collected from key witnesses, including suspects and both Palestinian and Israeli eyewitnesses of the incident;

live identification line-ups of Israeli civilian suspects were hardly ever carried out. 

The Yesh Din findings are not an aberration.

The group reports that when in 2006 it first examined the record of the Israeli Police in the Samaria and Judea districts it found that the rate of closure of files without any further action being taken was 90 percent. In other words, there has been no improvement in the two year interregnum. 

One of the loudest claims of the pro-Israel lobby is that it is, as Kevin Rudd wrote on December 10 2004, "a vibrant, democratic state in a region where democracy remains far from the norm.

"But in genuine democracies law enforcement authorities do not discriminate on the basis of race.

And Mr Rudd there can be no excuses for a nation that calls itself a democracy allowing so many serious criminal investigations to go into the "who cares, they are only Palestinians" basket.