Friday 17th of July 2026

beware of false prophets who are ruling the roost....

 

Politics and institutions are increasingly governed by risk management, not leadership. But real leadership requires imagination, courage and the willingness to challenge false stories.

Of course there are Trump, Netanyahu, Putin, Xi, Kim, and the Ayatollahs, who run their worlds according to their own story line, but none in any meaningful way serve democracies. But are they leaders? Leaders act and think transformationally. These guys, especially Trump, are interested only in transactions that further their storyline.

 

George Browning

The world does not need more risk managers

 

[SEE GUS's COMMENT AT THE END.......]

 

Sadly, while our world needs leaders, it demands managers, folk who engage in transactions which mitigate risk and follow ideological, often partisan, predetermined, paths. Such has become the climate of grievance and perceived fault that the industry of risk management has taken over politics, institutions and the Church.

Leadership is no longer treasured, either at a national or local level. Indeed, real leadership is perceived as risk. Paradoxically, amid frustration about the lack of leadership, we get people like those mentioned above who masquerade as leaders.

The life of every nation, community and family is shaped by the story it tells itself. The role of a leader is to exemplify, in word and action, the best version of that story, which can nourish the nation or group, and the world. The US, Israel, Russia, China, North Korea and Iran, have become the stories their leaders insist to be true. That they are not good stories is apparent, because of the consequences these stories inflict on others, both within their own nations and beyond.

The lives of individuals, families, communities and nations go through cycles. I understand the universal cycle to be an oscillation between order, disorder and reorder. The role of a leader is to discern the community/nation’s place in that cycle and, with courage, to forge a sustainable just, harmonious and productive path.

Order is clearly the desirable state. However, nothing in life remains static. A long-established pattern can be suddenly disrupted, or a pattern that had served well will eventually cease to be life giving and become life diminishing. Leaders will guide and direct a community through change, at times embracing or encouraging disruption or disorder so that a new and life-giving reordering might arise. We must be encouraged to embrace the price of disorder for a reorder to emerge. From my world, this is emblematically the cross and resurrection.

We are travelling through a major period of disruption. It is now commonly accepted the world community faces three existential threats: global warming, nuclear catastrophe and AI. In a scramble for economic dominance, none receive the attention they should.

The agrarian revolution was a great disrupter, but out of it a civilisation independent of hunter gathering was born. The industrial revolution was a great disrupter, but out of it a dominant middle class was born. Now we are in a digital revolution with AI at its apex, from which an outcome of creative and life-giving order is far from guaranteed. Courageous, wise and insightful leadership is needed.

But, because of a leadership void, politics and politicians lack respect. Those engaged in the political process are managers of internal factional ideologies and expectations. They develop the skill to wedge before being wedged. It appears politics is a game played in a bubble not in the real world of environmental threats, housing and health pressures, war.

Energy and how it is sourced lie at the heart of economic and environmental life. The industrial revolution was made possible using fossilised solar energy. The economic and environmental appropriateness of this source has passed. Transitioning to current abundantly available solar energy in all its forms is what we must do. That transitioning is expensive should not be apologised for. Economically and environmentally, it is the destiny we must embrace and look forward to. There can be no plan B.

It has been clear for some time the housing market and regulations surrounding it had spun away from a healthy equilibrium. Instead of being on the front foot in addressing the issue, the government has been forced to the back foot. It has allowed self-interested voices to speak of ‘liars and broken promises’. Regardless of what might have been said in the past, action in Australia’s and the world’s best interest is paramount. A promise that is not in the country’s best interest was a mistake and should be admitted as such.

The same managerial mindset prevails in our health and educational practice. Visiting health and aged care facilities, this truth is painfully obvious. Significant skilled staff time is expended behind computers filling online digital requests in submission to risk management requirements. Time spent with patients, clients or students is much reduced. No wonder staff are full of frustration. The same to be true for the medical profession, so much so that some practitioners opt out. Initiative is frowned upon. Prescribed steps must be followed.

In the Middle East we continue to support the idea of a two-state solution. It is nonsense. It is too late. It will not happen. It simply provides space for Israel to continue its genocidal policies. Leadership requires truth to be spoken. Pressure must be applied on Israel to enable all who live ‘between the river and the sea’, to enjoy the same rights, the same freedoms, the same dignity. This will not happen while the west refuses to sanction Israel, boycott trade and cease military cooperation.

In like manner, institutional Christianity has become all about management, not leadership. Strategies such as exist are overseen by insurance companies and risk managers. Bishops outsource their leadership to risk managers. There is little evidence that the injustices of the world are thought about, let alone addressed. Where are the voices that cry out in the wilderness? In the Anglican Church, where are the William Temples or Desmond Tutus let alone a Martin Luther King?

Where are the prophets?

Prophets are those who challenge false stories. Christian Zionism that has undergirded atrocities against Palestinians is a false story. Christianity that gives space to unrestricted capitalism is a false story. Christianity that permits the demonisation of others based upon their gender, sexuality, ethnicity or religious belief is a false story.

Where are the critics of capitalist excesses and the growth of inequity? Where is generosity in the face of difference, preparedness to recognise that others have seen what you have not? Why is popular Christianity so dualistic, so devoted to binaries?

We cannot attain what has not been first imagined. Leadership is about imagining a different outcome and generating sufficient trust and respect that community or nation will accept the cost of making such a vision a reality.

https://johnmenadue.com/post/2026/07/the-world-does-not-need-more-risk-managers/

 

IN YOUR DREAMS...

SINCE THE ADVENT OF SOCIAL STRUCTURES, THERE HAS BEEN NO LEADER IN THE ENTIRE WORLD WHICH DID NOT HAVE TO BE A CRISIS MANAGER. THE KINGS AND QUEENS OF EUROPE WOULD BE AT THE FOREFRONT OF THIS CAPER... MOST OF THEM WERE CRISIS CREATORS FIRST, WITH VARIOUS WARS, CONQUESTS, MARRIAGES AND OTHER TRICKS OF THE TRADE, TO BECOME HERO/RULERS UNDER THE AUSPICES OF A GOD THAT THE IGNORANT MASSES HAD TO FEAR. 

WHEN DEMOCRACY CAME ALONG TO GIVE THE PEOPLE THE RIGHT TO RULE THEMSELVES, WE STUPIDLY INVENTED A HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM IN WHICH PRESIDENTS AND/OR PRIME MINISTERS BECAME KING OR QUEEN ERSATZ — THEMSELVES SUPPORTED BY A COTERIE OF "NOBILITY" AKA PROPAGANDIST MEDIA, LOBBYISTS AND CLEVER TECHNOCRATS. THE PEOPLE ARE STILL LOOKING AT THEIR NAVEL ASKING WHAT WENT WRONG. 

WE CANNOT ATTAIN WHAT HAS NOT BEEN FIRST IMAGINED... SURE.

PRESENTLY A COUPLE OF LEADERS ARE IMAGINING A DIFFERENT SYSTEM OF COOPERATION BETWEEN NATIONS, BUT THEY HAVE TO FIGHT A WESTERN CIVILISATION ON THE WANE, THAT IS GETTING MORE AND MORE DANGEROUSLY AGGRESSIVE WHILE LOSING ITS GRIP.

THE UNITED NATIONS WAS CREATED TO MINIMISE AGGRESSION, BUT THE MOST POWERFUL NATION ON THE PLANET, WHICH REPRESENTS LESS THAN FIVE PERCENT OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION HAS BEEN THE BIGGEST AGGRESSOR OF ALL. SINCE 1945, IT IS LIKELY THANT MORE PEOPLE DIED FROM AMERICAN WARS, THAN DURING WW2. 

THE WAR IN UKRAINE? A CREATION OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE. BUT WE BLAME PUTIN FOR IT. WE, IN THE WEST HAVE BEEN CLEVER ABOUT HIDING THIS FACT. 

THE WAR IN IRAN? A CREATION OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE. SURE, SOME PEOPLE BLAME NETANYAHU AND HIS GREATER ISRAEL DREAMS WHICH INCLUDE THE DESTRUCTION OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE WHO RESIST BY WHATEVER MEANS. 

BUT AS POINTED OUT ON THIS SITE, THE MAIN CULPRIT IN OUR PRESENT TIME IS THE PENTAGON. THE PENTAGON — CREATED DURING WW2 TO CONCENTRATE THE WAR DEPARTMENT OF THE USA — IS A WAR MACHINE. A WAR MACHINE THAT DOES NOT GO TO WAR IS AS USELESS AS A TOOTHBRUSH ON MARS. 

THERE HAS BEEN REVOLUTIONS OF THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE. BUT THESE REVOLUTIONS WERE SOON TAMED BY THE MIDDLE-CLASSES INTO PROFITABLE BUSINESSES OR HORRORS OF AUTHORITY.

THE ONLY COUNTRY WHERE THE PEOPLE ARE IN CHARGE IS CUBA. I WILL LEAVE YOU WITH THIS THOUGHT AS AMERICA IS PREPARING TO DESTROY THIS SYSTEM TO REPLACE IT WITH AN AUTHORITARIAN "DEMOCRATIC" CAPITALISTIC OF GREEDY BASTARDS.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

GL.

 

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….

of them and us....

Jacinda Ardern is calling for more empathy in politics. 

Since stepping down as New Zealand's Prime Minister in 2023, Dame Jacinda has been warning against divisive and authoritarian leadership in favour of compassionate and values-driven governance.

She says that a tendency towards strongman leadership is missing the mark with voters.

"Often we hear discussion about authoritarianism now, more often than we'd hear about something like empathetic leadership," she told Sarah Kanowski on ABC Conversations.

"That is not where I believe the public are.

"If the public were in the same place, then we wouldn't be seeing all of the multitude of surveys that tell us that people feel disenfranchised, or that they feel that they're not represented by their politicians anymore."

Throughout her five years in the top job, Dame Jacinda gained recognition for her compassionate leadership style, particularly in her unifying response to the Christchurch terrorist attacks.

Dame Jacinda — who, after ending her time in office, was appointed to dual Harvard University fellowships for her leadership — says voter behaviour across Western liberal democracies reflects a growing disconnect between the public and the political system.

Her comments come as Australian polls this year have shown a surge in support for One Nation and its leader Pauline Hanson after sitting on the political margins for the best part of 30 years.

"I take [it] as a sign the fact that you see people voting for parties that are often on the fringes of the mainstream," she said.

"The majority of those who are doing that are often not voting for the ideology.

"They're just voting against the status quo because they don't think it serves them anymore.

"All the signs actually point to people wanting something different than what they're getting now. But, mostly, the options that people have don't always capture empathetic leadership."

Humanity during crisis

Dame Jacinda says she chose to lead with vulnerability in the wake of the 2019 terror attacks on two Christchurch mosques where 51 people were murdered.

"My instinct in the end was just actually to share how I felt," she said.

"Even if I wanted to stand in front of everyone devoid of emotion, I physically couldn't.

"I want to lead like a human first and a politician second."

Dame Jacinda said she had clear purpose in her first address after those attacks: not to inflame fear, not to respond with inaccuracies, and most of all, not to hand the perpetrator any kind of victory.

"I felt so angry that someone thought they could try and manipulate the New Zealand public to respond in a particular way, that part of the way they designed this horrific attack was to try and get people to react violently," she said.

"And I was so desperate to deny him that. But ultimately that was for New Zealanders to deny, and that's what they did."

Dame Jacinda says she initially believed effective leaders needed to avoid showing emotion in order to demonstrate strength and courage.

But she says that belief was slowly "chipped away" during her five years in office.

"If you're in front of a camera often enough, and you're in emotional situations often enough … your own response is going to come through," she said.

"And my conclusion was … that's a good thing.

"If we want to rebuild people's trust and confidence in politics, and we want to bring a bit more humanity in — which I think should be the goal — then we should allow ourselves to be human too."

Dame Jacinda found herself in a vulnerable position just weeks into her prime ministership when, after an extended struggle with fertility, she learnt she was pregnant.

While navigating a new role as Prime Minister, she announced the news to the public. 

Dame Jacinda held her breath, anticipating a swathe of criticism, but she says she was met with a "beautiful" response.

"I remember getting a letter quite early on into my pregnancy where someone wrote to me and said, 'I fell pregnant at the same time as you and I was terrified of telling my boss until I heard on the radio that you were pregnant. And when I heard that, I felt like everything was going to be OK.'"

What came next was the pressure to juggle the top job with societal expectations of motherhood.

"I remember thinking, 'I have to prove this is possible,'" she said.

"But you almost end up in this impossible bind where you're trying to prove that you're still working as hard and [are] as competent, and so you probably overcompensate a bit.

"But at the same time, particularly once baby arrives, you need to show that you're being a good and competent mother as well.

"And those two things would butt up against each other all the time."

What was also important to Dame Jacinda was demonstrating that flexible, family-friendly workplaces are achievable.

"You can create all the policies in the world, but unless you're role modelling something and showing that it's OK, then someone might personally still feel like it's difficult," she said.

After a desperate mother approached her in the supermarket saying "I don't know how to do it", the former PM realised she needed to be more transparent about her experiences.

"Somehow my example didn't make her feel better, it made her feel worse," she said.

"Like, 'I can't even wash my hands — this woman's running the country.'

"And so I said to her: 'But I don't do it on my own. I have support, and I have help.'"

She pointed out that her partner, Clarke Gayford, was — and is — the primary caregiver.

"So every opportunity, I would talk about that because, yes, women can have very fulfilling careers and operate at the highest level. And yes, they, at the same time, could be mothers and caregivers. But they should not do either of those things on their own and without support."

A fresh start 

While Dame Jacinda was praised internationally for her leadership style, she navigated criticism on home soil.

Amid declining approval polls and online threats towards herself and her family, she abruptly finished her time in office in 2023. She said she no longer had "enough in the tank" to do the job justice.

In her valedictory speech she stood by her leadership style and her belief that vulnerability does not equal weakness.

"You can be anxious, sensitive, kind and wear your heart on your sleeve," she said.

"You can be a mother, or not, an ex-Mormon, or not, a nerd, a crier, a hugger – you can be all of these things, and not only can you be here – you can lead."

Since signing off as PM, Dame Jacinda, Gayford and Neve, now eight, have been travelling overseas.

"We're just having an adventure," she said.

It was announced in March that they would settle in Australia, but Dame Jacinda rejects any notion that the move across The Ditch is a slight against her home country.

The move is a fresh start that's still relatively close to home.

"There's something about being able to have a little bit of distance from something that was all-encompassing in our lives," Dame Jacinda said.

"Because in a way, that period was all about my time in office. And this is my family's time."

Stream Jacinda Ardern's full Conversations interview from 11:00am today on ABC Local Radio or via the ABC listen app.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-17/jacinda-ardern-empathetic-leadership-in-politics/106900418

 

READ FROM TOP.

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….