John Menadue asked me what I thought Trump 2.0 could mean for Australia, but there are two similar, easier questions: what should and what will Trump mean for Australia?

The last is the easiest to answer – nobody, including Donald J. Trump, knows. The fickle and feckless nature of the next US president, let alone that of the oddballs jockeying for cabinet positions, has removed any idea of certainty about US policy.

 

Trumping Australia     By Michael Pascoe

 

IN ANOTHER LIFETIME, I WOULD BE ASHAMED OF HAVING DONE THE CRAPPY CARTOON MISCHIEF ABOVE. YET, THE POST-ELECTION COMMENTS FROM THE DEMOCRATS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS HAVE CONFIRMED WHAT THE SWINGING AMERICAN AVERAGE VOTER SAW: THE DEMOCRATS ARE FASCISTS, POSSIBLY MORE THAN DONALD (TRUMP) AND THE DEMOCRATS' HYPOCRISY IS TAKING THEM INTO UNFRIENDLY TOTALITARIAN TERRITORY AND THEY SUCK MORE AT ECONOMIC MATTERS....

THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT DONALD (TRUMP) IS THE ULTIMATE SAINT OF POLITICAL RITUALS... MEANWHILE JOE BIDEN'S ADMINISTRATION, WITH HIM IN LALALAND, IS "TRUMP-PROOFING" THE PRESIDENCY OF THE DEMOCRATS' WARMONGERING BY MAKING DEALS WITH THEIR CROOKED FRIENDS IN EUROPE. WE SHALL INVESTIGATE...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNDB1cS4yR8

AS THE INTERCEPT, LIKE MOST LEGACY MEDIA, FOAMS AT THE MOUTH AT THE ELECTION OF A "lawless authoritarian AND AN adjudicated rapist" FOR PRESIDENT OF THE USA (AKA OF "THE FREE WORLD" — A EUPHEMISM FOR DECEITFUL COLONIALISM OF THE WEST [AND OF THE PLANET] BY EMPIRE AMERICA), WE CAN'T ANALYSE A MILLION VIEWS BY A MILLION ANALYSTS AS TO WHAT WENT WRONG FOR SOME, ESPECIALLY SHRIEKING WOMEN OF THE LEFT, AND WHAT WENT GOOD FOR OTHERS — INCLUDING SHRIEKING MAGA WOMEN.....

... A COUPLE OF STORIES COULD EXPLAIN:

FIRST, WE WERE TOLD THAT THE YOUTH (POOR PETALS — THEY HAVE NO IDEA HOW WE PUSHED THROUGH MOUNTAINS OF SHIT INCLUDING WORLD WARS, AS TODAY'S YOUTH COULD THINK THAT POPPIES WERE ALL THERE WAS ABOUT WARS) WERE FLOCKING TO KAMALA (HARRIS) BUT PERCEPTIONS WERE MIXED:

Donald Trump has been declared the winner of the 2024 presidential race, prompting a meltdown in the Kamala Harris camp and the US corporate media – who are struggling to understand what went wrong.

Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel gives the top three reasons behind Trump's victory:

Abject Failure of “Bidenomics” Despite Borrowing and Spending Trillions of Dollars: "Americans vote thinking first about their economic welfare and prospects," Ortel told Sputnik. "The only beneficiaries of the Biden-Harris administration were connected political donors and insiders. Wages after taxes and inflation for private sector workers – the core slice – are way down and under continuing threat."

There is something rather like irony for both parties in this omnishambles US election: whichever one loses, it will be all their own fault. Michael Pascoe.

If the Republicans had chosen Nikki Haley instead of Trump, the election would be as good as over. She would have creamed it, tapping into voter dissatisfaction without stirring voter fear. 

Trump has been the best thing going for Harris. In a tight race coming down to a relative handful of votes in an actual handful of states, it has been the dislike/fear/revulsion sparked by Trump that will make the difference for a Harris win. 

 

Former president Donald Trump has taken to the stage in Florida to claim victory in the US election.

It is expected that he has secured enough votes to win the electoral college, with JD Vance as his vice president. 

"This is the greatest political movement of all time," Trump told supporters at his West Palm Beach election night event.

"Now it is going to reach a new level of importance because we're going to help our country heal."

It is only the second time a US president has won non-successive terms, after Grover Cleveland did the same in 1884.

Elon Musk, the world's richest man, is to spend election night with Donald Trump in Florida at his Mar-a-Lago resort, he said on X/Twitter. 

Mr Musk, the owner of Tesla and X, has been aggressively campaigning for the Republican candidate in swing states across the country.

Trump's campaign is hosting watch parties including at his Mar-a-Lago home and also Palm Beach Convention Center for thousands of supporters.

The tech billionaire has emerged as one of the most important backers of Trump and donated more than $119m (£91.6m) this election cycle to America PAC - a political action committee he created to support the former president.

Ever since 25 July 1945, the U.S. Government has had, as its #1 objective, to take control ultimately over all other countries (“hegemony”); and its main targets to conquer have been the world’s largest country, which is Russia, and then the world’s most populous country, which has been China. In order to do this, the U.S. regime needed to deceive their public to believe that ‘freedom and democracy’ were what they spread around the world by their coups and invasions, ...

 

The federal government has quietly delayed plans to introduce local content requirements for major streaming platforms, with no indication of when it might return to work on the policy.

Local content quotas were a centrepiece of Labor's major arts policy, which was aimed at rejuvenating the local industry after the pandemic and released nearly two years ago.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) - US billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has designated as a lie the statement made by US Vice President and Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris that US troops are not deployed in any war zones.

During the presidential debate with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on September 10 Harris said that there currently was "not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world.”

 

"I know [US] troops [are] in war zones. As vice president, you're privy. You know the official troops and the unofficial troops. What she said was a flat-out bold-faced lie. Next-level bold-faced lie. An absurd lie," Musk said in a podcast with Joe Rogan released on Tuesday.

 

The presidency must be destroyed. It is the primary evil we face, and the cause of nearly all our woes. It squanders the national wealth and starts unjust wars against foreign peoples that have never done us any harm. It wrecks our families, tramples on our rights, invades our communities, and spies on our bank accounts. It skews the culture toward decadence and trash. It tells lie after lie. Teachers used to tell school kids that anyone can be president. This is like saying anyone can go to hell. It’s not an inspiration; it’s a threat.

 

BY The Misesian

The US and its allies are waging a hybrid war against Russia, but their aggressive sanctions are hurting the world’s poorest nations the most and backfiring on Washington, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has stated.

Lavrov delivered his remarks at the Inventing the Future symposium in Moscow on Monday, where he asserted that the United States and its allies are reviving the spirit of the Cold War by declaring the need to eliminate perceived “threats” to their dominance from Russia, China, and other countries pursuing independent national policies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3_xRGoJqpU

'The Five' not silent about Kamala Harris going mum on Trump

 

The co-hosts of 'The Five' take a closer look at Vice President Harris opting to no longer mention Trump by name in rallies in the final hours before Election Day.

 

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

“It’s hard to do cartoons without laughing…”

         Gus Leonisky

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte met with Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin on Monday, in his first visit to Germany as the alliance's chief.

Of particular security concern for the NATO countries at the moment is the recent addition of North Korean soldiers to Russian troops fighting in Ukraine, marking a new escalation of the conflict.  

This presidential campaign season may be one of those turning points in history for reasons good and bad. Anyone watching the one debate between the Republican and Democratic Party candidates would not have come away with the view that this was a great battle of competing principles and visions for the future.

 

BY RON PAUL

 

It was a campaign of name-calling and bullets, where one candidate avoided discussing ideas at all costs – and even avoided the media at all costs. Where the other candidate dodged two attempted assassinations while throwing red meat rhetoric to an understandably angry population.