Wednesday 12th of November 2025

the ordinary persistence of nasty evil today....

‘Hermann Göring loved his kids. That’s what’s terrifying’: James Vanderbilt, Rami Malek and Michael Shannon on Nuremberg....

Russell Crowe has a malevolent charm as the Nazi on trial in a compelling new film. His co-stars and director explain how they understood this monster – and the persistence of evil today

 

Ryan Gilbey writes about film and theatre for the Guardian

 Among the Nazis who were prosecuted during the Nuremberg trials in 1945 and 1946 was Hitler’s second-in-command, Hermann Göring. Less widely known, though, is the involvement of the US psychiatrist Douglas Kelley, who spent more than 80 hours interviewing and assessing Göring and 21 other Nazi officials prior to the trials. As described in Jack El-Hai’s 2013 book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist, Kelley was charmed by Göring but also haunted by his own conclusion that the Nazis’ atrocities were not specific to that time and place or to those people: they could in fact happen anywhere. He was ultimately destroyed by this discovery, and what he saw as the world’s reluctance to heed it.

The writer-director James Vanderbilt, whose script for David Fincher’s enigmatic serial-killer drama Zodiac similarly explored the real-life case of a professional being corroded by his pursuit of truth, has used The Nazi and the Psychiatrist as the basis of his new film, Nuremberg. Russell Crowe plays the preening, charismatic Göring, Rami Malek plays Kelley, and Michael Shannon is Robert Jackson, the American supreme court justice who was not only instrumental in mounting the trials but went head-to-head with Göring in court.

 The line ‘Hitler made us feel German again’ is haunting. Very reminiscent of a line we hear today

For Malek, it allowed him to re-examine ideas about evil that had been on his mind since playing Safin – the man who killed James Bond, no less – in No Time to Die. “When I was playing a Bond villain, I used to remind myself, ‘He’s an evil human being.’ Then I started to question those thoughts.” He wanted to believe in evil, he says, but his empathy kept getting in the way. “The banality of it all struck me as well as it did Douglas Kelley. It must have been quite jarring for him to know that this could happen at any time, under any political regime, and it wasn’t restricted to a group of men in that period. We see now, and will continue to see, that atrocity is able to rise furiously and vigorously in mere moments. Sometimes it is because we’re willing to turn a blind eye towards it.”

Vanderbilt recognised in this material a kind of real-life Silence of the Lambs quality, with Kelley drawn into a seductive dance with a psychopath. “One of the fascinating things about Göring was that he was funny, gregarious, charming,” says the film-maker. “He loved his wife and kids – which to me makes him even more terrifying. He wasn’t Darth Vader, you know? But he craved power and was comfortable with other people suffering so long as he could maintain that power.”

Shannon witnessed his co-star’s electrifying charisma in the role. “Russell really took the note about Göring being a charming man,” he says. “Some of the people playing the other members of the Nazi high command didn’t even have lines but he always made them feel like a group. They came in together singing songs, with Russell leading them.”

Crowe had been attached to the film since 2019, and Vanderbilt had already been working on it for five years by then. But before it began shooting, another Holocaust movie emerged that adopted a radical new approach to the subject: the horrors in Jonathan Glazer’s Oscar-winning The Zone of Interest, which is set largely in the house and garden adjacent to the Auschwitz concentration camp, are heard and hinted at but never shown.

“I saw The Zone of Interest while we were in pre-production,” recalls Vanderbilt. “It’s a great film. I loved its point of view.” How concerned was he that it might leave the more traditional Nuremberg looking archaic, or even obsolete? “I think there’s room for different approaches,” he says. “Our film is a little bit more classical. A friend of mine calls a certain type of film – and The Zone of Interest isn’t one of these – ‘spinach movies’. You know: you have to eat your vegetables, do your homework, take your medicine. I worked hard to not make Nuremberg feel that way.”

Shannon believes audiences should take their dose of Nuremberg, however. “It ought to be mandatory viewing,” he says. “Everybody should see the film, and everybody should think about what happened, because it has huge relevance to what’s happening now. But also, it’s a piece of entertainment. And that’s a strange thing, to make a piece of entertainment about such a serious subject. It’s a movie in the grand, old-fashioned sense of the word.”

He, too, admires The Zone of Interest. “It puts the audience in a position where they have to imagine what they can’t see,” he says. “That’s when you’ve truly engaged them.” But whereas Glazer’s film shows next to nothing, Nuremberg takes the opposite tack: it includes a five-minute excerpt from the documentary footage of the concentration camps that was projected during the trials.

Shooting the scene in which that is played in court left Shannon feeling queasy. “While I was being filmed watching the footage, I was very uncomfortable with the idea of quote-unquote ‘acting’. I didn’t want the camera on me. Something about it seemed kind of profane, and yet I understand why it is in the film. You’ll notice I introduce the footage and then they don’t cut back to me. I think that’s a reflection on how uncomfortable I was. They probably said, ‘Let’s not cut back to Shannon. He looks funny.’”

When I relay this to Vanderbilt, he laughs and denies any such thing. “Michael was brilliant. And we’re not always supposed to be comfortable when we’re doing our work, right? I asked the cast not to watch the footage from the camps ahead of shooting because I wanted them to be fresh on the day. We brought in a real projector. We had 300 extras in court. I went in and said, ‘This is going to be a tough day, but I think it’s very important for the story we’re telling.’ We had a moment of silence, then rolled the film. I don’t want to say that no acting was required, but you’re seeing a lot of real emotions in those faces.”

One area the film-maker seems less eager to pursue is the question of what it means to be releasing Nuremberg into a world in which fascist ideas are increasingly mainstream and even detoxified, and in which one of the wealthiest and most powerful men in the world can give what appears to be a fascist salute in public and still go on to be richly remunerated.

Much of the dialogue in Nuremberg resonates with our times. Not least the moment when Göring says admiringly of Hitler that he “made us feel German again”. Vanderbilt denies any intentional echoes of a more recent US political slogan. “I wrote that line in 2014,” he points out. Maybe so, but he also chose to keep it in the script even once the Maga movement had gained not only adherents but ubiquity. “Sure. Look, I understand the desire to relate it to today, and I’m not saying people shouldn’t. I’m not trying to be vague. I just think that all good drama speaks to us about where we are now.”

It’s understandable that Vanderbilt should not want to deter Trump supporters from seeing his film. Malek, though, is less circumspect. “‘Hitler made us feel German again’ is a haunting line that is shattering in its simplicity,” he says. “And it’s very reminiscent of a line we hear today, which ends with the same word.” He is conspicuously not repeating the Maga slogan to which he is referring. However: “I think everyone reading your newspaper will know exactly what I mean.”

Shannon goes even further. “The danger exists outside of this movie,” he says gravely when I ask whether giving so much screen time to Göring is playing with fire. “The danger is all around us. We are suckers for this charm. It’s going to be our downfall, it seems. We’d rather be entertained than taken care of. It’s tragic, really.”

He describes the experience of life in the US today as “a nightmare. America is a nightmare right now. The country is mentally ill. It needs help. There seem to be delusions of grandeur and self-loathing in equal measure. It gets grimmer every day. I’ve never seen such dysfunction in my life. It’s really embarrassing.”

At the end of the film, Kelley is reprimanded for bashing the US while promoting his book about the Nazis. Perhaps the publicists for Nuremberg will be tearing their hair out when they hear Shannon’s remarks. “I’m sure anybody who’s associated with promoting and selling this movie to the world is going to be horrified by everything I’ve said in this interview,” he agrees. “But I don’t really care.”

  • Nuremberg is in UK cinemas from 14 November, and in Australian cinemas from 4 December

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/nov/11/nuremberg-interview-rami-malek-michael-shannon-hermann-goring-russell-crowe

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

SEE ALSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4G2KGEkSyI&t=120s

THIS LONG INTERVIEW OF RUSSELL CROWE BY JOE ROGAN IS INTERESTING... ONE SHOULD ALSO REMEMBER THAT ALBO AND RUSSELL CROWE FOUGHT THE MURDOCH EMPIRE WHEN IT WAS WORKING TO DESTROY THE RABBITOHS....

the trial...

Nuremberg is a 2025 American psychological thriller historical drama film written, co-produced, and directed by James Vanderbilt. It is based on the 2013 book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist by Jack El-Hai. In Nuremberg, psychiatrist Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek) is challenged with determining if Hermann Göring (Russell Crowe) is fit to stand trial at the Nuremberg trialsLeo WoodallJohn SlatteryMark O'BrienColin HanksWrenn SchmidtLydia PeckhamRichard E. Grant, and Michael Shannon have supporting roles in the film.

The film had its world premiere in the Gala Presentations section of the Toronto International Film Festival on September 7, 2025,[3] where it received a four-minute standing ovation, one of TIFF's longest standing ovations ever.[4] It was released theatrically in the United States by Sony Pictures Classics on November 7, 2025. The film received generally positive reviews from critics, with particular praise for Crowe's performance.

Plot[edit]

On May 7, 1945, the last day of World War II, Reichmarshall Hermann Göring surrenders to a group of American troops. After being informed of the arrest, Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson is told about plans for an International Military Tribunal to charge the surviving top Nazi leaders with war crimes. The problem facing the Allies is how to establish proceedings without precedent and charge individuals for crimes of great magnitude. Jackson is asked to serve as the American prosecutor, which requires taking a leave of absence from the Supreme Court. He meets prosecutor David Maxwell Fyfe, who represents the British team.

Douglas Kelley arrives in Germany to serve as prison psychiatrist for the Nazi leaders. He meets Sergeant Howie Triest and receives his orders from Colonel Andrus. Kelley realizes that overseeing the prisoners' mental health would make great material for a book, which he hopes can leave a lasting impression on the world. Upon meeting Göring for the first time, Kelley surmises that the man is much more intelligent than he lets on. His hunch is confirmed when Göring recognizes English and later speaks it to him. Kelley classifies Göring as very intelligent, charismatic, and narcissistic, with a high imagination and a strong capacity for self-delusion. Kelley is most fascinated by how Göring was taken by Hitler's passionate speeches and ability to inspire loyalty. Göring admits to establishing concentration camps as labour camps, but denies they were intended for extermination, blaming the late Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heydrich. Göring confides to Kelley that he will somehow escape execution by the Allies. Kelley meets with the other defendants, including labor leader Robert Ley, naval commander Karl Dönitz, and propogandist Julius Streicher. After indictments are served to the defendants, Ley has a nervous breakdown and commits suicide by self-strangulation. To prevent similar acts, Colonel Andrus places a 24-hour watch on the prisoners and removes all objects deemed contraband. As the trial draws near, Kelley attempts to get through to Hitler's former deputy Rudolf Hess, whom he believes is feigning amnesia. He persuades Göring to assist with jogging Hess's memory, in exchange for delivering letters to Göring's wife Emmy and daughter Edda. Kelley later visits the Göring family and develops a rapport with them. During his off-duty hours, he strikes up a friendship with Lila, a journalist for The Boston Globe.

Andrus decides that Kelley's objectivity has become compromised and brings in psychiatrist Gustave Gilbert to provide a second opinion. Prior to the start of the Nuremberg trials, Göring plans to deliver a statement to the tribunal, which Kelley brings to Jackson's attention. It becomes apparent to Jackson that Göring is preparing to use the trial as a platform to defend Nazism and delegitimize the Allied occupation of Germany. During the entering of pleas, the judges silence Göring's attempts to address the court. A documentary film of Nazi concentration camps is screened, leaving Kelley and several others deeply shaken. Kelley confronts Göring in his cell afterwards, who flippantly dismisses the film's content and suggests it was staged. Kelley learns that Emmy has been taken into custody for alleged involvement in Göring's art theft's, while Edda has been handed over to a nunnery. After drunkenly revealing crucial information regarding Göring's case to Lila, Andrus dismisses him from his position and orders him to return to America, before revealing that Emmy and Edda have been released. While preparing to leave Germany, he meets with Triest, who reveals his German-Jewish heritage and the loss of his parents during the war. Guilty as to his impassivity towards Göring, Kelley returns to Nuremberg and offers Jackson all of his notes regarding Göring.

During Göring's cross-examination, Jackson, who has not prosecuted a case in years, questions him directly. Göring gives long, drawn-out answers while denying knowledge of atrocities being committed against Jews in Europe. He claims that the Final Solution was initially meant to be a "complete solution" in emigrating the Jews out of Germany, rather than an act of wholesale extermination. Jackson's increasing ire towards Göring prompts a stern rebuke by the judges. Maxwell Fyfe steps in to cross-examine Göring, successfully goading him into professing his continued loyalty to Hitler. The tribunal finds Göring guilty on all four counts and sentences him to death by hanging. Kelley, Jackson, and Fyfe take satisfaction in their efforts to bring the Nazi leaders to justice.

On the eve of his execution, Göring commits suicide by swallowing a cyanide capsule. Despite this, Andrus orders the execution of the remaining Nazis to go ahead as planned, beginning with Streicher. Kelley later publishes a book regarding his experiences in Nuremberg, 22 Cells in Nuremberg, which sells poorly. Plagued by alcoholism and increasingly distraught over the possibility of another regime like Nazi Germany emerging in the future, Kelley takes his own life with a cyanide capsule in 1958. End titles reveal that Triest managed to bring his sister home to America, and Jackson's efforts to prosecute Göring later formed the foundation for international prosecution of war crimes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_(2025_film)#Reception

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NUREMBERG TRIALS WERE A SHOWCASE OF DECEPTION WHILE USING THE TRUTH... THE AMERICANS CARRIED ON USING NAZIS (FROM GERMANY AND UKRAINE) TO UNDERMINE RUSSIA.... WE HAVE EXPOSED THIS MANY TIMES ON THIS SITE. SEE:

https://yourdemocracy.net/drupal/node/47119