Tuesday 18th of November 2025

a deal that demonstrates global resolve....

Government ministers from around the world are preparing for a final few fraught days of talks at the UN climate summit as they bid to secure a deal that demonstrates global resolve amid increasing assertiveness from developing nations.

The job will not be easy. Countries are now digging into some of the toughest issues – many of which have been left off the formal agenda to ensure the talks keep moving even if one issue gets hung up.

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is also expected to arrive on Wednesday to help rally consensus among parties at the summit in the Amazon city of Belem ahead of Friday’s final scheduled session.

New dynamics in climate diplomacy have seen China, India and other developing nations flex more muscle this year, while the European Union is hobbled by weakening support back home and the once-dominant United States has skipped out altogether.

Asked if there was any one issue dominating the talks, COP30 President Andre Correa Do Lago replied: “Everything, everything. It’s very complicated.”

Brazil’s top goal for COP30 is to deliver an agreement that reaffirms the 2015 Paris Agreement, while acknowledging its shortcomings by laying out clear plans for future climate action.

The summit’s work is “dry, it’s complicated, it’s anguished, it’s tiring – and it’s absolutely necessary,” said Britain’s energy minister, Ed Miliband.

Over the last week negotiators had a chance to air their differences on three key issues: climate finance, unilateral trade measures, and planned emissions cuts that don’t go nearly far enough.

The Paris treaty’s central goal, to prevent warming beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, will be missed.

Current emissions trends have the world warming by at least 2.3 degrees Celsius, which Norway’s climate minister said parties agreed would need to be addressed.

“It is a must-have to be able to talk about how we close the gap going forward,” the minister, Andreas Bjelland Eriksen, told Reuters.

A bloc of developing countries is also seeking a payment schedule to ensure wealthy countries follow through on promises made at last year’s COP29 to annually deliver $US300 billion ($A461 billion) in climate finance by 2035. The United States – absent from COP30 – has reneged on past commitments.

China’s growing role in the UN climate talks follows decades of Beijing representing developing-country interests at the talks while growing its own green technology sector.

“It’s not that China set out with a brilliant new strategy; it just happened,” said Li Xing, a professor at the Guangdong Institute for International Strategies.

“With the US stepping back – Trump isn’t interested in this sector at all – China sees an opening and says, ‘We’re interested; we’re willing to go’,” Li told Reuters in Beijing.

Another testy issue has some developing countries grousing about carbon border taxes or tariffs imposed by some countries on Chinese-made green products, given the now-urgent need for the world to speed its clean energy transition. 

https://michaelwest.com.au/cop30-delegates-dig-into-toughest-issues-in-final-week/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

of fleas....

 

It’s the endgame for Liberal moderates. Here’s what happens next

by Michael Pascoe

 

Mainstream reporting created the illusion that the Federal Liberal Party’s “Moderates” still mattered before the net-zero vote but Michael Pascoe says the faction was already deep in the endgame of a seven-year decline. 

There’s been more coverage of the Coalition’s turmoil than there was of the Melbourne Cup but missing was the reality that the Liberal Moderates had been scratched before the race. The curtain had been drawn around them. It’s just a matter of the vet arriving to finish it. 

Switching from equine to canine metaphors, I’ve written it before and it’s worth writing again: Queensland’s LNP is the Coalition dog, the Liberal Party is the tail, the “Moderates” merely fleas on the tail. 

And last week the mongrel displayed a new anti-flea collar and gulped a double dose of NexGard, covering ticks and worms as well. 

What’s been underplayed is just how few fleas there are left to deal with and how they’ve been jumping off the dog for seven years. 

Fleas exit hound

Leaving aside the Queensland LNP hybrids, there are only two Moderates left with city seats. There’s Tim Wilson in Melbourne’s Goldstein and Julian Leeser in Sydney’s Berowra and even it has fair bit of bush in its northern end. 

Wilson won back his seat by just 175 votes. Leeser suffered a near-six per cent swing, cutting his margin to 3.2 per cent. The LNP’s climate policy will do neither of them any favours at the next election.

There are arguably only three other Moderate MPs: Susan Ley, Mary Aldred and Melissa Price, all rural/regional.

The Moderates’ strength, to use the word loosely about what eight people can do, is in the Senate, the sheltered workshop for members who lost their House seats or would have little chance of winning one, where our duopoly politics deliver the party votes and Senators’ real election is their party pre-selection. 

The eight – Dave Sharma, Maria Kovacic and Andrew Bragg from NSW; Anne Ruston, Kerrynne Liddle and (maybe) Andrew McLachlan SA; Richard Colbeck Tasmania; Jane Hume Victoria – have varying use-by dates. The persistence of the right and its financial backing plus moderate rank and file members deserting a party that no longer represents them does not bode well for future preselection battles. 

To a large extent, they are a somewhat protected species thanks to the difficulty the community independents movement, the please-don’t-call-us-Teals, getting its act together to form the party structure necessary to run a Senate ticket.

That might not always be the case and, with or without Teal competition,  a party dominated by the right could be expected to place Moderates in the less secure positions on Senate tickets. 

In any event, it’s in the House of Reps where the leadership and any hopes of government reside. There the future looks LNP. 

Queensland’s hybrid system of LNP members subsequently choosing to identify as Liberal or National when they get to Canberra makes sense for the remnants of a Liberal Party whose policy is set by the Nationals anyway. 

The two or three nominally “moderate” LNP members identifying as Liberals have more in common with National LNP members like Littleproud and Canavan than Julian Leeser and Tim Wilson. 

A single conservative identity?

On the trajectory both parties are on, a federal LNP will increasingly appeal, eventually a single conservative identity. 

And what happens to the moderate remnants? With the possible exception of Julian Leeser who could do an Andrew Gee and perhaps retain his seat as an independent, they would fold as they always do to keep their jobs as long as possible. 

It’s the inevitable end to a process that started with Malcolm Turnbull losing the Prime Ministership in 2018. That’s when the moderates quit. 

As a political force, the moderates had already left the building before the Teal revolution.

To plagiarise a piece I wrote before the 2022 election:

The moderate leadership quit between the 2016 and 2019 elections, leaving those remaining powerless.

Eight Liberal ministers or assistant ministers elected in 2016 – all from the relatively liberal side of the party – did not stand at the 2019 election.

Those eight included the leader and deputy leader of the party, the field vacated to the “Morrison club/centre right” and Peter Dutton’s “national right”.

And there are more liberal Liberals not contesting this month’s election – John Alexander, Scott Ryan and Tony Smith.

The Sydney Morning Herald was euphemistic when it described the three most “influential” moderates – Simon Birmingham, Marise Payne and Paul Fletcher – as being “cut from similar cloth and … quieter personalities than their factional predecessors Christopher Pyne, Julie Bishop and George Brandis”.

Whatever their personalities, their quietness represents weakness to the point of irrelevance.

And those three “most influential moderates” all quit before this year’s election, leaving the present fleas. 

It’s hard to see Leeser sticking with this Liberal Party much longer once it gets around to dumping Sussan Ley as leader and would Sussan stay on after being dumped or do a Malcolm? 

The others, well, they’re moderates. They have their jobs to consider. 

Andrew Bragg provides a good example of moderate spine. He said he would quit the frontbench if net zero was dumped. It was dumped. As far as I’ve heard, he hasn’t quit. 

https://michaelwest.com.au/its-the-endgame-for-liberal-moderates-heres-what-happens-next/

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.