Monday 8th of December 2025

all is well in the best of the worlds...

The EU has once again strayed beyond acceptable boundaries, slapping Elon Musk’s social media platform X with harsh penalties for being in violation of new draconian EU digital laws that many say are code for censorship.

 

Elon Musk wants to abolish the EU. He has a point
The “bureaucratic monster” that has just fined X €120 million is wrapping its tentacles around free speech

BY Robert Bridge

 

On Friday, the European Commission unleashed the billionaire tech mogul’s wrath after it fined X €120 million (about $140 million) for “breaching its transparency obligations” under the 2022 Digital Services Act, which sets standards for accountability and content moderation. The ruling by the 27-nation bloc called the platform’s blue checkmark system ‘deceptive’ and accused it of weak advertising transparency and failing to provide required data access.

In response, Musk had his own ‘X-it’ moment when he called for the abolition of the EU and the return of national sovereignty to its 450 million subjects. In a series of blistering posts on the weekend, Musk argued that “EU bureaucracy is slowly smothering Europe to death.”

“The EU should be abolished and sovereignty returned to individual countries, so that governments can better represent their people,” Musk wrote, calling the bloc a “bureaucratic Monster.”

Musk’s opponents say he is just overreacting to the fine. They argue that the penalty is a drop in the bucket for the richest man on the planet, representing just 6% of X’s $2.3 billion in projected advertising revenue for 2025, and a minuscule amount of Musk’s total worth (the EU initially planned to include all of Musk’s holdings as targets for fines, which would have brought many billions into EU coffers). While that may be true, it’s the principle and precedent that people should be concerned about. That’s exactly how bureaucracy slowly strangles its unsuspecting victim – it starts off slowly and unoffensively and before long the tentacles have extended in all directions. Once the “bureaucratic monster” of the EU gets a taste of imposing its formidable will on social media companies, there will be no end to the bureaucratic red tape and secret back-door demands. As of November 2025, the European Commission has started 14 investigations into DSA compliance. As a result, serious criminal charges against social media companies and their owners may be forthcoming.

Telegram co-founder Pavel Durov knows a lot about the long arm of the EU’s bureaucratic machine and the grave threats it poses. In August 2024, Durov was arrested after landing at Le Bourget Airport in France and eventually indicted on 12 charges, including complicity in the distribution of child pornography material and narcotics, extremely serious and vile charges that turned out to be false. Was the Russian-born entrepreneur targeted because he refused to play ball? It seems very possible.

Durov, who was facing 20 years in a French prison, made a startling claim that the head of France’s foreign intelligence agency Nicolas Lerner asked him to ban Romanian conservatives ahead of the country’s elections, a request he says he flatly refused. Durov noted that he hadn’t silenced groups related to the political opposition or protests in any country, and “wasn’t about to start now.”

The response by the French intelligence agency to Durov’s allegation was absolutely chilling. It confirmed that “indeed, they were forced to contact Pavel Durov directly several times in recent years to remind him of his company’s responsibility to prevent threats of terrorism and child pornography,” but it “strongly denies the allegations that in these cases there were requests to ban accounts in connection with an electoral process.”

There seems little reason to believe that Durov, who said that Telegram moderators take down “millions”of potentially harmful posts every single day, would have had anything to gain by fabricating the incident. But what is extremely unsettling about France’s response is how easy it is to toss around explosive words like “terrorism” and “child pornography” to achieve the desired result, which is, of course, the censorship of undesirable views.

Last year, Elon Musk relayed a similarly shocking situation that saw him blackmailed by the unelected members of the European Commission.

“The European Commission offered X an illegal secret deal: if we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us,” Musk wrote on X.

“The other platforms accepted that deal. X did not,” he continued. “We look forward to a very public battle in court, so that the people of Europe can know the truth.”

Now, it will be very interesting to see what kind of charges Musk – who was once under investigation by French prosecutors over so-called “algorithmic bias” – and X will face in the future: support for terrorists, child molesters, drug traffickers? Anything is possible, which is why so many social media platforms and their creators cave to such impossible pressure.

What does the future of social media look like in such a hostile and unpredictable environment? At the very least, holding innovators personally responsible for potential abuse of their tools would discourage the development of new technologies in the first place. At worst, it could spell jail time and other extreme penalties for those brave holdouts who fail to toe the state-sponsored line. In other words, we are facing very dark times for the world of social media, which threatens to be silenced into oblivion, that is, unless Mr. Musk gets his wish and the “bureaucratic monster” of the 27-member EU is rendered obsolete once and for all.

https://www.rt.com/news/629149-musk-abolish-eu-x/

 

===============

 

Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski has told Elon Musk to “go to Mars” after the billionaire called for the abolition of the European Union.

Sikorski, a renowned neo-liberal Russia hawk, was responding to criticism posted by the American tech entrepreneur on his X platform. The EU should be dismantled and that sovereignty should return to member states “so that governments can better represent their people,” he said, adding “How long before the EU is gone?” with the hashtag #AbolishTheEU.

Musk’s comments followed a decision by the European Commission to fine X €120 million ($130 million) under its Digital Services Act, claiming the platform had failed to meet transparency rules for ads and user accounts. Musk has repeatedly criticized EU policies, calling them overly restrictive and harmful to free speech. Replying on Sunday, Sikorski said: “Go to Mars. There’s no censorship of Nazi salutes there.”

Sikorski appeared to reference an incident in January 2025 during US President Donald Trump’s inauguration parade. Musk was seen making a gesture similar to the Roman salute, which involves extending the right arm outward with an open palm. The motion has been compared to the Nazi salute, which is banned in several countries including Russia.

https://www.rt.com/news/629142-sikorski-mock-musk-eu-comment/

 

================

 

The United States remains the EU’s most important ally, despite Washington publishing a new national security strategy that is highly critical of Western Europe, the bloc’s foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas has claimed.

Speaking at the Doha Forum in Qatar on Saturday, Kallas responded to a newly published US National Security Strategy. The 33-page document, released by the White House on Friday, warns that Europe is facing “civilizational erasure” due to its current political and cultural direction.

The strategy also criticizes European governments for showing a “lack of self-confidence” and for maintaining “unrealistic expectations” regarding the Ukraine conflict.

Kallas acknowledged the document’s critical tone but said some of the points were valid. “Of course, there's a lot of criticism, but I think some of it is also true,” Kallas said. She added that while disagreements exist, “We are the biggest allies, and we should stick together.”

“The US is still our biggest ally,” she stressed.

Relations between the United States and the European Union have been tense since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January 2025. Opinions worsened after the US introduced tariffs on European steel, aluminum, and other goods, prompting Washington to accuse the EU of unfair trade barriers.

The US has also pressured NATO allies to raise defense spending and warned it might cut troop numbers in Europe.

Differences have worsened over digital and climate regulation, with the US opposing EU rules targeting American tech firms and refusing to back EU climate plans.

On Friday, the European Commission fined Elon Mus’s platform X €120 million ($130 million) under the Digital Services Act. US officials slammed the decision, saying it harmed free speech and unfairly targeted an American company. In February, US Vice President J.D. Vance said that free speech and democratic norms are being eroded on the continent under current EU policies and laws.

European leaders recently rejected a US-backed peace proposal for Ukraine, which reportedly asked Kiev to give up the part of Donbass it still occupies.

https://www.rt.com/news/629131-kallas-us-top-eu-ally/

 

==============

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

EU fourth reich....

The European Union is using legal tools to pressure social media platforms and steer public debate on politically sensitive topics, Portugal-based international law expert Alexandre Guerreiro has told RT.

His comments came after the EU fined platform X €120 million ($163 million) last week for allegedly failing to comply with transparency requirements under the bloc’s 2022 Digital Services Act. The platform’s US-based owner, Elon Musk, responded by denouncing the EU, likening it to “the Fourth Reich.”

Guerreiro argued that the DSA is only one element of a broader regulatory framework that gives Brussels significant leverage over online communication.

“We have a lot of bureaucrats trying to impose and limit, to put conditions on creativity and free speech,”he said.

According to the scholar, the EU’s approach amounts to an attempt “to have full monopoly and full control” not only over major online platforms, but over “basically the messages and the speech” circulating on them.

Watch the full interview.

https://www.rt.com/news/629159-x-fine-speech-control/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.